skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 220817  
Title: Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence
Journal: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research  Volume:13  Issue:3-4  Dated:2007  Pages:227 to 232
Author(s): Murray A. Straus
Sponsoring Agency: University of New Hampshire
Family Violence Research Program
United States

US Dept of Health and Human Services
National Institute of Mental Health
United States
Publisher Url*: http://www.springer.com 
Publication Date: 2007
Pages: 6
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: Netherlands
Language: English
Grant No.: T32MH15161
Annotation: This paper identifies and describes seven methods used to conceal and distort evidence on the balance or symmetry in partner violence.
Abstract: Method one is the suppression of evidence. Researchers who have an ideological commitment to the idea that men are almost always the sole perpetrator often conceal evidence that contradicts this belief. Method two is to avoid obtaining data inconsistent with the Patriarchal Dominance Theory. This method asks female participants about attacks by their male partners and avoids asking them if they had hit their male partner. Method three cites only studies that show male perpetration. This method of concealment is institutionalized in publications of governments, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization. Method four is to conclude that results support feminist beliefs when they do not. Method five is to create “evidence” by citation; where ideology can be converted into “evidence by citation.” Method six is to obstruct publication of articles and obstruct funding research that might contradict the idea that male dominance is the cause of partner violence. Lastly, method seven is to harass, threaten, and penalize researchers who produce evidence that contradicts feminist beliefs. The seven methods described above have created a climate of fear that has inhibited research and publication on gender symmetry in partner violence and largely explain why an ideology and treatment modality has persisted for 30 years, despite hundreds of studies which provide evidence on the multiplicity of risk factors for partner violence, of which patriarchy is only one. The exclusive focus on male perpetrators and the exclusive focus on just one of the many causes have hindered this extension of the rule of law and the effort to end domestic violence. References
Main Term(s): Domestic assault
Index Term(s): Feminism ; Male female offender comparisons ; Domestic violence causes ; Domestic assault prevention ; Gender issues
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242646

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder