Correctional Officer Stress

Publications

Addressing Correctional Officer Stress: Programs and Strategies

National Institute of Justice, 2000

Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS), Executive Summary and Final Report

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003

FOCUS I Survey and Final Report: A Summary of the Findings: Families Officers and Corrections Understanding Stress

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001

Focus Program, Final Report

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow, Back Again the Next Day: Absenteeism and its Antecedents Among Federal Correctional Staff

Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2005

Individual and Institutional Demographic and Organizational Climate Correlates of Perceived Danger Among Federal Correctional Officers
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2008

Lessons Learned From Early Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS) Programs

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001

Stomp Out Stress

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003

Stress and Job Satisfaction in an Urban Sheriff's Department: Contributions of Work and Family History, Community-Oriented Policing and Job Assignment

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003

Work and Family Support Services for Correctional Officers and Their Family Members; A National Survey

National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001

For additional resources on this topic, conduct a search of the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

Related Resource
 

National Institute of Corrections (NIC): Stress Management

This section of the NIC Web site contains a listing of resources related to stress management for correctional officers.

Links from the NCJRS Web site to non-Federal sites do not constitute an endorsement by NCJRS or its sponsors. NCJRS is not responsible for the content or privacy policy of any off-site pages that are referenced, nor does NCJRS guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correct sequencing of information. NCJRS is also not responsible for the use of, or results obtained from the use of, the information. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate the content and usefulness of information obtained from non-Federal sites.