|
Correctional Officer Stress
Publications
Addressing Correctional Officer Stress: Programs and Strategies
National Institute of Justice, 2000
Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS), Executive Summary and Final Report
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003
FOCUS I Survey and Final Report: A Summary of the Findings: Families Officers and Corrections Understanding Stress
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001
Focus Program, Final Report
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow, Back Again the Next Day: Absenteeism and its Antecedents Among Federal Correctional Staff
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2005
Individual and Institutional Demographic and Organizational Climate Correlates of Perceived Danger Among Federal Correctional Officers
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2008
Lessons Learned From Early Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS) Programs
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001
Stomp Out Stress
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003
Stress and Job Satisfaction in an Urban Sheriff's Department: Contributions of Work and Family History, Community-Oriented Policing and Job Assignment
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2003
Work and Family Support Services for Correctional Officers and Their Family Members; A National Survey
National Institute of Justice-Sponsored, 2001
For additional resources on this topic, conduct a search of the NCJRS Abstracts Database.
Related Resource
National Institute of Corrections (NIC): Stress Management
This section of the NIC Web site contains a listing of resources related to stress management for correctional officers.
Links from the NCJRS Web site to non-Federal sites do not constitute an endorsement by NCJRS or its sponsors. NCJRS is not responsible for the content or privacy policy of any off-site pages that are referenced, nor does NCJRS guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correct sequencing of information. NCJRS is also not responsible for the use of, or results obtained from the use of, the information. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate the content and usefulness of information obtained from non-Federal sites.
|