Bureau of Justice Assistance: Program Brief
corner graphic vertical line graphic
 

Legislatively Authorized Byrne Program Purposes

Both discretionary and formula grant funds may be used to implement programs that carry out any of the following 29 legislatively authorized purposes:

  1. Demand-reduction education programs in which law enforcement officers participate.

  2. Multijurisdictional task force programs to integrate federal, state, and local drug law enforcement agencies and prosecutors for the purpose of enhancing interagency coordination and intelligence and facilitating multijurisdictional investigations.

  3. Programs to target the domestic sources of controlled and illegal substances, such as precursor chemicals, diverted pharmaceuticals, clandestine laboratories, and cannabis cultivations.

  4. Community and neighborhood programs to assist citizens in preventing and controlling crime, including special programs that address crimes committed against the elderly and special programs in rural jurisdictions.

  5. Programs to disrupt illicit commerce in stolen goods and property.

  6. Programs to improve the investigation and prosecution of white-collar crime, organized crime, public corruption, and fraud against the government, with priority attention to cases involving official corruption.

    1. Programs to improve the operational effectiveness of law enforcement through the use of crime analysis techniques, street sales enforcement, schoolyard violator programs, and gang-related and low-income housing drug control programs.

    2. Programs to develop and implement anti-terrorism plans for deep-draft ports, international airports, and other important facilities.

  7. Career criminal prosecution programs, including the development of model drug control legislation.

  8. Financial investigative programs to identify money-laundering operations and assets obtained through illegal drug trafficking, including the development of model legislation, financial investigative training, and financial information-sharing systems.

  9. Programs to improve the operational effectiveness of courts by expanding prosecutorial, defender, and judicial resources and implementing court delay-reduction programs.

  10. Programs to improve the corrections system and provide additional public correctional resources, including treatment in prisons and jails, intensive supervision programs, and long-range corrections and sentencing strategies.

  11. Prison industry projects to place inmates in realistic working and training environments that enable them to develop marketable skills. With these skills, inmates are better able to support their families and themselves in the institution and make financial restitution to their victims.

  12. Programs to identify and meet the treatment needs of adult and juvenile drug- and alcohol-dependent offenders.

  13. Programs to provide assistance to jurors and witnesses and assistance (other than compensation) to victims of crime.

    1. Programs to improve drug control technology, such as pretrial drug testing programs; to provide for the identification, assessment, referral to treatment, case management, and monitoring of drug-dependent offenders; and to enhance state and local forensic laboratories.

    2. Criminal justice information systems (including automated fingerprint identification systems) to assist law enforcement, prosecution, courts, and corrections organizations.

  14. Programs to demonstrate innovative approaches to enforcement, prosecution, and adjudication of drug offenses and other serious crimes.

  15. Programs to address drug trafficking and the illegal manufacture of controlled substances in public housing.

  16. Programs to improve the criminal and juvenile justice system's response to domestic and family violence, including spouse abuse, child abuse, and elder abuse.

  17. Programs with which states and local units of government can evaluate state drug control projects.

  18. Programs to provide alternatives to detention, jail, and prison for persons who pose no danger to the community.

  19. Programs to strengthen urban enforcement and prosecution efforts targeted at street drug sales.

  20. Programs to prosecute driving-while-intoxicated charges and enforce other laws relating to alcohol use and the operation of motor vehicles.

  21. Programs to address the need for effective bindover systems for prosecuting violent 16- and 17-year-old juveniles in courts with jurisdiction over adults. (The crimes are specified.)

  22. Law enforcement and prevention programs for gangs and youth who are involved in or are at risk of involvement in gangs.

  23. Programs to develop or improve forensic laboratory capability to analyze DNA for identification purposes.

  24. Programs to develop and implement anti-terrorism training and procure equipment for local law enforcement authorities.

  25. Improving the quality, timeliness, and credibility of forensic science services for criminal justice purposes.

  26. Programs to enforce child abuse and neglect laws, including laws protecting against child sexual abuse, and promoting programs designed to prevent child abuse and neglect.

  27. Programs to establish or support cooperative programs between law enforcement and media organizations to collect, record, retain, and disseminate information useful in the identification and apprehension of suspected criminal offenders.

Note: Congress has authorized the use of Byrne funds to support programs that assist in the litigation of death penalty federal habeas corpus petitions and for drug testing initiatives. This authorization applies to awards for FYs 1998–2002 and may not be available in future funding cycles.

 

FY 2002 Byrne Formula Grant Program State Allocations

State FY 2002 Allocation Percentage To Be Passed Through to Local Jurisdictions State FY 2002 Allocation Percentage To Be Passed Through to Local Jurisdictions
Alabama $7,763,473 50.95% Montana $2,562,472 58.56%
Alaska 2,158,472 21.97    Nebraska 3,749,473 60.36   
American Samoa 953,222 0 Nevada 4,170,473 62.01   
Arizona 8,766,474 61.04    New Hampshire 3,052,472 51.46   
Arkansas 5,670,673 54.87    New Jersey 13,584,474 57.67   
California 50,933,474 63.15    New Mexico 3,907,473 42.23   
Colorado 7,549,473 58.82    New York 29,080,474 63.29   
Connecticut 6,235,473 36.96    North Carolina 13,048,474 41.36   
Delaware 2,388,472 26.87    North Dakota 2,181,472 56.16   
District of Columbia 2,078,472 100.00    N. Mariana Islands 470,076 0
Florida 24,687,474 61.56    Ohio 17,895,474 64.42   
Georgia 13,249,474 53.39    Oklahoma 6,301,473 45.41   
Guam 1,443,752 0 Oregon 6,258,473 46.98   
Hawaii 3,016,472 46.45    Pennsylvania 19,257,474 64.83   
Idaho 3,137,473 52.41    Puerto Rico 6,826,473 0
Illinois 19,460,474 64.51    Rhode Island 2,777,472 41.76   
Indiana 10,160,474 56.78    South Carolina 7,125,473 42.53   
Iowa 5,532,473 40.79    South Dakota 2,346,472 47.16   
Kansas 5,183,473 47.49    Tennessee 9,586,474 48.78   
Kentucky 7,169,373 32.30    Texas 31,831,474 65.60   
Louisiana 7,795,473 51.92    Utah 4,515,473 49.76   
Maine 3,109,473 41.59    Vermont 2,344,472 25.11   
Maryland 9,009,474 44.47    Virgin Islands 1,398,472 0
Massachusetts 11,591,053 34.52    Virginia 11,624,474 30.04   
Michigan 15,820,474 53.10    Washington 9,886,474 60.25   
Minnesota 8,456,474 70.29    West Virginia 3,892,473 47.93   
Mississippi 5,412,473 52.52    Wisconsin 9,108,474 61.98   
Missouri 9,448,474 58.22    Wyoming 1,963,472 54.95   


navigation bar graphic


Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Program August 2002
Previous Contents Next BJA logo