Chart II-D-1: Agencies Performing Screening and Assessment: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
ST |
Jurisdic. |
Juv. Court Intake |
County Juv. Agency |
Health Department |
Social Services |
Local Subst Abuse Agency |
TASC |
||||||||
|
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scrn |
Assess |
||
|
AL |
Birming-ham |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
Frchcmp |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
San Francis-co |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
Bureau of drug and alcohol assessment counselor |
Bureau of drug and alcohol assessment counselor |
||||||||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
Health and Human Service |
Health and Human Services |
||||||||||||
|
DE |
Wilming-ton |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
|||||||||||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauder-dale |
Spectrum Program -- Private Agency |
|||||||||||||
|
FL |
Jackson-ville |
x |
x |
Provider |
Provider |
||||||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
Drug Court Treatment Program |
|||||||||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
|||||||||||||
|
FL |
Pensa-cola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
Juvenile Drug Court Case Coordina-tor |
|||||||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
KY |
Louis-ville |
Drug Court Tx Personnel |
Drug Court Treatment Personnel |
||||||||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
Private CCDC |
Private CCDC's |
||||||||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
Drug Court Coord-inator |
||||||||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
NV |
Duck-water |
x |
x |
Private Indian Program |
|||||||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas (Juv) |
x |
Private Treatment Provider |
||||||||||||
|
OH |
Lancas-ter |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||||||
|
SC |
Charles-ton |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
x |
|||||||||||
(2) Principal Changes Introduced by Juvenile Drug Court in Screening and Assessment Process
The principal changes instituted in the screening and assessment process of the reporting juvenile drug courts are: the use of a standardized screening and assessment process; the conduct of more comprehensive assessments; more intensive involvement of the parent in the assessment process; and earlier assessments and prompter reporting of results
b. Family Drug Court
Most of the family drug courts rely upon local health departments, substance abuse agencies, or juvenile service agencies for screening and assessment services and use, in addition to these agencies, private treatment agencies for case management services.
Chart II-D-2: Agencies Performing Screening and Assessment: Family Drug Courts
|
ST |
Jurisdic. |
Juv. Ct Intake |
Co. Juv. Agency |
Social Serv |
Health Dept. |
Substance Agency |
TASC |
Other Local Agency |
|||||||
|
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scr |
Assess |
Scrn |
Assess |
||
|
FL |
Pensacola |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
MA |
Greenfield |
x |
Project Coord. |
||||||||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
Private Tx Provider |
||||||||||||
|
NV |
Reno |
x |
x |
||||||||||||
|
NY |
Central Islip |
x |
2. Case Management and Other Program Support Functions
a. Agencies Providing Case Management and Other Support Functions
The agencies most frequently used to provide case management and other support services for juvenile drug courts are probation departments (47%) and private treatment providers (30%). Approximately one-third of the programs use more than one agency. The agencies providing case management services for drug courts are depicted on Chart D-3 which follows.
Chart II-D-3: Agencies Performing Case Management and Other Support Functions:: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Staff Support by Court |
Pretrial |
Prob. |
Dept. Social Serv. |
Dept. Juv. Ser. |
TASC |
Priv. Tx |
Public Health |
Local Substance Abuse Agency |
Other |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
|||||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
|||||||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
|||||||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
|||||||||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
Program staff, special programs for youth, division of health department and probations |
|||||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
x |
Public Defender's Office |
||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
DE |
Wilmington |
x |
|||||||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
Drug Court Program |
||||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
Private Case Management Provider(s) under Contract |
||||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
Court Administration/Case Coordinator |
||||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
|||||||||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
|||||||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
drug court staff |
|||||||||
|
MI |
Kalamazoo |
||||||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
|||||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
drug court coordinator |
||||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
x |
n/a |
|||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x* |
Drug court |
||||||||
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
Chart II-D-4: Agencies Performing Case Management and Other Support Functions:: Family Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Staff Support by Court |
Pretrial |
Prob. |
Dept. Social Serv. |
Dept. Juv. Ser. |
TASC |
Priv. Tx |
Public Health |
Local Agency |
Other |
|
FL |
Pensacola |
x |
|||||||||
|
MA |
Greenfield |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Drug Court Case Manager |
||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
NV |
Reno |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
NY |
Central Islip |
x |
b. Case Management and Other Support Functions Performed
(1) Juvenile Drug Courts
As Chart II-D-5 below illustrates, case management and other support functions provided to juvenile drug courts encompass a multitude of services, ranging from assessment, to client orientation and referral to treatment; to preparation of court reports; urinalysis monitoring; on-site and off-site counseling; data entry and visits to treatment agencies.
Chart II-D-5(1): Case Management and Other Program Support Functions Performed: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Assessment |
Client Orient |
Referral to Tx (dedicated) |
Referral to Tx (not dedicated) |
Preparation of Court Reports |
Appear at Hearings |
Presentation of Court Reports |
Ancillary Rehabilitation |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
DE |
Wilmington |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
FL |
Tampa |
x* |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
NV |
Duckwater |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
NV |
Las Vegas (Juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Chart II-D-5(2): Case Management and Other Program Support Functions Performed: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
ST |
Jurisdiction |
Urinalysis Monitoring |
Client Supervision |
Onsite Counseling |
Data Entry |
Offsite Counseling |
Treatment Development |
Tx Visiting |
Other |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
DE |
Wilmington |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
job placement |
||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
x |
x |
x |
*By Case manager's at Assessment Center |
|||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
x |
||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
NV |
Las Vegas (Juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
(2) Family Drug Courts
Case management functions performed for family drug courts span a similar range of services, as illustrated in Chart D-6 which follows:
Chart II-D-6 (1): Case Management Functions and Other Support Functions Performed: Family Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Assessment |
Client Orient |
Referral to Tx (dedicated) |
Referral to Tx (not dedicated) |
Preparation of Court Reports |
Appear @ Hearings |
Presentation of Court Reports |
Ancillary Rehabilitation |
|
FL |
Pensacola |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
MA |
Greenfield |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |