Chart II-D-10: Drug Testing Frequency in Juvenile Drug Courts: Phase 4
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Phase 4: Twice per Week |
Phase 4: Once per Week |
Phase 4: Every Other week |
Phase 4: Other Frequency |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
monthly |
|||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
random |
|||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
|||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
|||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
depends on the individual participant |
|||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
|||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
at least 1 x per month |
|||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
|||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
|||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
|||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
1 time/wk |
b. Drugs For Which Tests Are Conducted
As Chart D-8 indicates, most juvenile drug courts are conducting limited testing of participants at the initial time of program entry, but follow up with routine periodic testing for a fuller screen of substances, particularly if there is any suspicion of their use.
Chart II-D-11(1): Drugs Tested For Initially/Routinely: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Alcohol |
Barbiturates |
Heroin |
Marijuana |
Crack/Cocaine |
|||||
|
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
||
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
x |
x |
||||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas (Juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Chart II-D-11(2): Drugs Tested For Initially/Routinely: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
LSD |
Methamphetamines |
PCP |
Other |
||||
|
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
Initially |
Routinely |
||
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
benzodiazepines, propoxyphene (*included opiates w/heroin category) |
||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
inhalants |
|||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
|||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
|||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
If suspected |
||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
As indicated at assessment |
|||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
x |
means that will do initially if requested |
||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
benzodiazines |
||||||
|
MI |
Kalamazoo |
||||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
|||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
x |
||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
creatinene ÷ lets us know if kids are tying to flush out their system |
||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas (Juvenile) |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
inhalants |
inhalants |
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
x |
x |
opiates, benzodiazephene |
opiates, benzodiazephene |
|||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
c. Costs per drug screen
As Chart II-D-12 illustrates, the costs for drug testing of juvenile drug court participants ranges between $ 1-$5 for approximately 40% of the programs and over $ 10.00 for another 40%. None of the reporting family drug courts, on the other hand, spend more than $ 3.00 per test. The relatively high costs for juvenile drug court testing compared with that experienced by many adult drug courts may be the result, in part, of the smaller volume of tests bing conducted.
Chart II-D-12: Costs Per Drug Screen: Juvenile and Family Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
$1-3.00 |
$3.01-5.00 |
$5.01-7.00 |
$7.01-9.00 |
$9.01-12.00 |
$12.01-15.00 |
$15.01-18.00 |
$18.01+ |
Explanation(s) |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
||||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
Usually minor does not pay this cost. |
|||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
||||||||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
||||||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
||||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
$30.00 |
|||||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
||||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
Provided by treatment provider as part of overall contract, cost unknown at this time |
||||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
||||||||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
|||||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
||||||||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
24.00 |
we recently began using Dtx also -- on-site test for immediate positive/ negative response. We then send to accu-chem if we need to confirm amount | >
|||||
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
||||||||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
d. Agencies Performing Urinalysis
Urinalysis for juvenile drug courts is performed by a variety of different agencies, most frequently by private treatment providers and probation departments.
Chart II-D-13: Agencies Performing Urinalysis: Juvenile Drug Courts
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Pretrial Services |
Prob. Dept |
Corrections Agency |
TASC |
Private Tx |
Crim. Lab |
Public Health |
Private Lab |
Other |
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
||||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
||||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
DE |
Wilmington |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
On-site lab |
||||||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
private treatment provider as part of their service |
|||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
Case manager who reports to judge only. |
|||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
||||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
|||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
||||||||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
||||||||
|
KY |
Bowling Green |
|||||||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
||||||||
|
MI |
Kalamazoo |
|||||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
||||||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
Private lab when calibration needed. We use "Quick test" immunoossy test. These are done at probation office. |
|||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
||||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
x |
||||||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
With the exception of the possibility of a blood or urine test at time of arrest or issuance of citation, only hand-held PBT for presence of alcohol is available and only for treatment purposes. Nearest computerized breath testing instrument for alcohol, or hospital for taking blood sample, is 74 miles away. |
||||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
||||||||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
ACCU-Chem, Texas |
|||||||
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
||||||||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
e. Timeframes and Methods for Reporting Urinalysis Results to Court
Obtaining urinalysis reports appears to be a much slower process for juvenile and family drug courts than for their adult counterparts. Seven (25%) of the reporting programs require 8-24 hours and ten require over one day. On the other end, three of the reporting programs can obtain results in one to two hours and nine (30 %) can obtain urinalysis results in under one hour. For most of the reporting programs (13), urinalysis report are provided orally in court. Nine transmit reports by telephone; seven fax a hard copy. The remainder either mail a report or transmit it electronically.
Chart II-D-14: Timeframe for Obtaining Urinalysis Results
|
State |
Jurisdiction |
Juvenile |
Family |
HOURS |
|||||
|
<1 |
1-2 |
2-4 |
4-8 |
8-24 |
over 24 |
||||
|
AL |
Birmingham |
x |
3-4 days |
||||||
|
AZ |
Phoenix |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
Auburn |
x |
4-7 days |
||||||
|
CA |
EL Dorado |
x |
5-7 Days |
||||||
|
CA |
French camp |
x |
3-4 days |
||||||
|
CA |
San Francisco |
x |
|||||||
|
CA |
San Jose |
x |
x |
||||||
|
CA |
Tulare |
x |
2-7 days |
||||||
|
DE |
Wilmington |
x |
|||||||
|
FL |
Bartow |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Ft. Lauderdale |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Jacksonville |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Key West |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Orlando |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (family) |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Pensacola (juvenile) |
x |
x |
||||||
|
FL |
Tampa |
x |
x* |
* 1-2 hours if requested ÷ typically available at next court date |
|||||
|
IL |
Chicago |
x |
x |
||||||
|
KY |
Bowling Green |
x |
x |
||||||
|
KY |
Louisville |
x |
2-3 days |
||||||
|
MA |
Greenfield |
x |
x |
x |
If needed |
||||
|
MI |
Kalamazoo |
x |
|||||||
|
MO |
Benton |
x |
x |
||||||
|
MT |
Missoula |
x |
Quick test results in 5 minutes - is positive we send off for calibration/verification. Depends when sent in. |
||||||
|
NJ |
Jersey City |
x |
|||||||
|
NM |
Las Cruces |
x |
x |
Treatment provider = 8-24 hours Probation Dept. = 1 week |
|||||
|
NV |
Duckwater |
x |
|||||||
|
NV |
Las Vegas |
x |
x |
x |
|||||
|
NV |
Reno |
x |
at bi-weekly review |
||||||
|
NY |
Central Islip |
x |
x |
less than one hour for in-court tests drug test from treatment agencies take 2-5 days |
|||||
|
OH |
Lancaster |
x |
x |
x |
Dtx |
||||
|
SC |
Charleston |
x |
average of 4 days |
||||||
|
UT |
Salt Lake City |
x |
x |
x |
On site testing Lab test |
f. Response to Positive Urinalysis
As with other major decision points in the drug court process, the judge was reported as the ultimate decision maker regarding how the drug court will respond to positive urinalyses. Close consultation is maintained, however, with the drug court team. Many programs also noted that the response to a positive urinalysis is made on a case by case basis. The range of potential responses to positive urinalysis include:
intensifying treatment: 78%
judicial admonition: 68%
more frequent urinalysis: 65%
short-term detention-less than 5 days: 50%
longer term detention -more than 10 days: 33%
program termination for repeated positive tests
(on a case by case basis): 33%
Sanctions for positive urinalyses and other indicators of program noncompliance are discussed further in Section H below.
6. Program Policies Regarding Use of Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions
Almost all of the reporting juvenile and family drug courts permit the use of prescription anti-depressants. Duckwater, Greenfield and Central Islip permit the use of methadone but most drug courts require withdrawal within a prescribed timeframe. Pensacola, Greenfield and Duckwater also permit the use of antibuse. Duckwater also permits the use of naltrexone and peyote in church ceremonies. For many of the juvenile drug court programs, the issue regarding the use of pharmacotherapeutic interventions has not yet been raised so no formal policy has been articulated.
7. Program Policies Regarding Use of Alcohol
None of the reporting juvenile drug courts permit the use of alcohol by participants and all but one of the family drug courts (Las Vegas) prohibit alcohol use. The Las Vegas program strongly discourages alcohol consumption by participants.. The prohibition on the use of alcohol
by most drug court programs stems from the recognition of (1) the addictive nature of alcohol consumption; and (2) the complex interrelationship between the use of alcohol and other drug dependencies.
E. Services Provided to Juvenile and Family Drug Court Participants
1. Type and Frequency of Treatment Services Provided
The charts that follow depict the range and frequency of treatment, rehabilitation, and other support services provided to juvenile drug court participants and their families. As Charts II-E-1 and II-E-2 illustrate, approximately half of the programs provi