Chart II-E-4(2): Aftercare Services: Juvenile Drug Courts

Chart II-E-4(2): Aftercare Services: Juvenile Drug Courts

State	Jurisdiction	Referrals to Services	Mentor Program	Emergency/ Hotline	Relapse Prevention	Support Services	Other
AL	Birmingham	x
CA	EL Dorado	x
CA	San Francisco	x	x			x	in court appearance Aftercare is Phase IV; the preceding services are available if needed
CA	San Jose						We are working on this now. Will include all of these.
CA	Tulare	x			x	x	Case management services Probation supervision
DE	Wilmington
FL	Bartow			x
FL	Orlando	x
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)						In planning stages. Developing mentor program.
FL	Tampa	x					Quarterly follow-ups for 1 year
IL	Chicago	x
KY	Louisville			x	x	x
NJ	Jersey City	x			x		Aftercare is a component of drug court program. Judge still supervises.
NM	Las Cruces	x	x		x	x	home, school, environment, peers, address 4 area's
NV	Duckwater	x				x	the aftercare component is very weak
NV	Las Vegas (juvenile)	x			x
OH	Lancaster	x	x*		x	x	*in the future
SC	Charleston						this part of the program to be established

5. Participants with Mental Disorders

The juvenile and family drug courts report a much lower incidence of mental disorders among the drug court participants than their adult counterparts. As Chart II-E-5 illustrates, approximately 40% of the reporting juvenile drug courts noted some incidence of mental disorder, most frequently depression. Approximately half of the reporting programs have the capability of treating some mental disorders of participants, either by the treatment provider or through special contract with another agency, as depicted by Chart II-E-6.

Chart II-E-5: Frequency of the Presence of Mental Disorders Among Juvenile and Family Drug Court Participants

State	Jurisdiction	Depression	Bipolar	Anxiety	Psychosis	Other
AL	Birmingham					These diagnosis are provided by the mental health liaison. DD clients are served only when the abuse/dependence diagnosis is primary
CA	Auburn	20%		10%	0%
CA	French camp	8%	4%	4%
CA	San Jose	30%	29%
CA	Tulare	20%
FL	Bartow					do not accept
FL	Key West	60%			1%
FL	Orlando		4%
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)	2%	2%
FL	Tampa	15%	2%			1%
IL	Chicago	40%	.1%	.5%	.5%
KY	Louisville					n/a
MT	Missoula	60%		20%
NM	Las Cruces	10%	10%
NV	Duckwater	20%
OH	Lancaster	45-50%	5%	10%	0
SC	Charleston	1%
UT	Salt Lake City	10-20%

Chart II-E-6: Services to Treat Mental Disorders: Juvenile Drug Courts

State	Jurisdiction	Special Tx		Special Liaison		Cooperative Agreement		Explanation
		No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes
AL	Birmingham	x		x		x	x
AZ	Phoenix	x		x
CA	Auburn	x			x		x
CA	EL Dorado					x
CA	French camp	x
CA	San Jose		x		x		x
CA	Tulare	x			x		x
DE	Wilmington
FL	Bartow	x			x		x
FL	Ft. Lauderdale	x			x		x
FL	Jacksonville		x		x		x
FL	Key West		x		x		x
FL	Orlando	x*			x	x	x	*These clients referred outside the program
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)		x*		x			*By referral
FL	Tampa	x			x	x	x	Cooperative Agreement with Tampa Bay Academy, PAR, Crisis Center
IL	Chicago		x		x
KY	Louisville	x		x			x
MI	Kalamazoo					x
MO	Benton	x		x
MT	Missoula		x	x		x	x
NJ	Jersey City	x*		x**				but referrals can be made *but treatment providers will be liaison
NM	Las Cruces		x		x		x*	*Yes FYI
NV	Duckwater		x		x	x	x
NV	Las Vegas (juvenile)	x			x
OH	Lancaster		x		x		x	Specialized Tx Services @ Mental Health Center
SC	Charleston	x		x			x
UT	Salt Lake City	x			x		x

F. Types of Agencies Providing Treatment Services and Number of Treatment Providers Serving Juvenile and Family Drug Courts

Chart II-F-1 depicts the variety of local agencies providing treatment services to juvenile drug courts. The most frequently used agencies are: local substance abuse agencies (65%) and private treatment providers (50%) .

Chart II-F-1: Types of Agencies Providing Treatment Services to Juvenile Drug Courts

State	Jurisdiction	Staff Sup. by Court	Pre-trial	Probation	Dept. Social Ser.	Dept. Juv. Ser.	TASC	Private Tx	Public Health	Local Subst Abus Ag	Other
AL	Birmingham									x	State MH-sponsored inpatient
AZ	Phoenix						x	x
CA	Auburn			x	x						Office of Education
CA	EL Dorado			x				x			Case Volunteers
CA	French camp			x						x	County Office of Education
CA	San Francisco	x						x	x	x
CA	San Jose							x		x	YWCA
CA	Tulare			x					x	x
DE	Wilmington							x		x
FL	Bartow	x
FL	Ft. Lauderdale									x
FL	Jacksonville	x			x	x		x	x		Safety council, cultural council, school system, Bridges foundation.
FL	Key West	x		x		x			x
FL	Orlando							x
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)							x
FL	Tampa									x	Several other private agencies
IL	Chicago	x		x			x	x	x	x
KY	Louisville										drug court staff, outpatient
MO	Benton									x
MT	Missoula							x		x
NJ	Jersey City	x						x			community mentor programs
NM	Las Cruces	x	x	x				x			DA, PD, Police, CASA, Public School
NV	Duckwater				x				x		Only one principal treatment provider = only IHS (Indian Health Services). It is the Local Public Rural Mental Health Agency, not just Local Public Health. IHS-RTC's, HHS Duckwater Shoshone Tribe
NV	Las Vegas (Juvenile)			x				x
OH	Lancaster	x		x		x*				x	*Court and alternative school
SC	Charleston		x	x		x				x
UT	Salt Lake City				x			x		x

Chart II-F-2 illustrates the number of different treatment providers servicing each of the responding juvenile drug courts. One half of the programs use one principal treatment provider Fifteen percent use 3-5 different treatment providers and another fifteen percent uses 6-8 providers. The staffing complement of the treatment component of drug courts generally includes full and part time clinical staff; full and part-time support staff; physical and mental health specials; and acupuncturists for those programs providing acupuncture. Case management services are generally provided by drug court staff or other local agencies (see Chart II-E-2 above).

Chart II-F-2: Number of Treatment Providers Used: Juvenile Drug Courts

State	Jurisdiction	1 Tx Provider	2 Tx Providers	3-5 Tx Providers	6-8 Tx Providers	8+ Tx Providers
AL	Birmingham			x
AZ	Phoenix		x
CA	Auburn	x
CA	EL Dorado	x
CA	San Francisco				x
CA	San Jose				x
CA	Tulare	x
DE	Wilmington	x
FL	Bartow		x
FL	Ft. Lauderdale			x
FL	Jacksonville	x
FL	Key West			x
FL	Orlando	x
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)	x
FL	Tampa	x
IL	Chicago				x
KY	Louisville	x
MO	Benton			x
MT	Missoula				x
NJ	Jersey City	x
NM	Las Cruces	x
NV	Duckwater	x
NV	Las Vegas (Juvenile)	x
OH	Lancaster				x
SC	Charleston	x
UT	Salt Lake City			x

G. Frequency of Judicial Contact with Participants

1. Juvenile Drug Courts

Judges in 70% of the reporting juvenile drug courts maintain at least bi-weekly contact with participants through the conduct of in-court status hearings. The frequency of these hearings usually decreases as the participant progresses, with most programs conducting hearings every three weeks to one month when the participant enters the final phases of the program.

Chart II-G-1: Frequency of Judicial Contact with Juvenile Drug Court Participants � Phases 1 and 2

State	Jurisdiction	PHASE I				PHASE II
		Weekly	Every Other Week	Monthly	Other	Weekly	Every Other Week	Monthly	Other
AL	Birmingham	x					x
AZ	Phoenix	x					x
CA	Auburn		x				x	x
CA	EL Dorado		x		* Phase 4: only if a violation of probation and referred by probation			x
CA	French camp		x					x
CA	San Francisco	x							depends on individual
CA	San Jose		x					x
CA	Tulare		x					x
DE	Wilmington			x
FL	Bartow				as needed
FL	Ft. Lauderdale			x	x			x
FL	Jacksonville	x				x
FL	Key West			x				x
FL	Orlando				As needed; written reports are submitted monthly
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)	x					x
FL	Tampa		x		Depending on the drug usage and compliancy of the program		x		Depending on the drug usage and compliancy of the program
IL	Chicago		x					x
KY	Louisville	x					x
MI	Kalamazoo
MO	Benton		x				x
MT	Missoula	x				x
NJ	Jersey City	x					x
NM	Las Cruces		x				x
NV	Duckwater	x			Every other month in Phase 4			x
NV	Las Vegas			x				x
OH	Lancaster	x					x
SC	Charleston	x					x
UT	Salt Lake City				Usually every 4-6 weeks but depends on progress. Some may be seen weekly.

Chart II-G-2: Frequency of Judicial Contact with Juvenile Drug Court Participants � Phase 3

State	Jurisdiction	PHASE III
		Weekly	Every Other Week	Monthly	Other Month	Other
AL	Birmingham			x
AZ	Phoenix			x
CA	Auburn			x
CA	EL Dorado			x
CA	French camp					every six weeks
CA	San Francisco					depends on individual
CA	San Jose			x
CA	Tulare			x
FL	Bartow					to complete
FL	Ft. Lauderdale			x
FL	Jacksonville	x	x
FL	Key West			x
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)			x
FL	Tampa			x		Depending on the drug usage and compliancy of the program
IL	Chicago				x	Every other month
KY	Louisville			x
MO	Benton		x
MT	Missoula	x
NJ	Jersey City			x
NM	Las Cruces		x
NV	Duckwater			x	x	Every other month
NV	Las Vegas			x
OH	Lancaster			x
SC	Charleston			x

As Chart II-G-3 illustrates, the frequency of court contact with parents of juvenile participants is similar to that maintained with the juvenile,, at least during the first phase of the program and until the juvenile evidences the likelihood that he or she will successfully participate in the program.

Chart II-G-3: Frequency of Judicial Contact with Parents of Juvenile Drug Court Participants � Phases 1 and 2

State	Jurisdiction	PHASE I				PHASE II
		Weekly	Every Other Week	Monthly	Other	Weekly	Every Other Week	Monthly	Other
AL	Birmingham				as needed				as needed
AZ	Phoenix	x					x
CA	Auburn	x					x	x
CA	EL Dorado		x		Phase 4: If violation of probation			x
CA	San Francisco	x							depends on individual
CA	San Jose		x					x
CA	Tulare				At orientation and whenever parents come. Many parents work.				at orientation and whenever parents come. Many parents work.
DE	Wilmington			x
FL	Bartow				as needed
FL	Ft. Lauderdale			x				x
FL	Jacksonville	x				x	x
FL	Key West			x				x
FL	Orlando				As needed
FL	Pensacola (juvenile)	x					x
IL	Chicago		x					x
KY	Bowling Green				varies
KY	Louisville				as needed				as needed
MI	Kalamazoo		x
MO	Benton	x					x
MT	Missoula	x				x
NJ	Jersey City		x				x	x
NM	Las Cruces			x			x
NV	Duckwater	x
NV	Las Vegas	x						x
OH	Lancaster				Case by case basis. Weekly to every 4-6 weeks		x
SC	Charleston						x

Continue