Skip to Main ContentAn Honest Chance: Perspectives on Drug Courts
  Contents  

II. Drug Histories and Motivation for Entering Drug Court

Each focus group session began with an introduction of the group members and discussion of their substance abuse histories—the stage each had reached in the drug court treatment process as well as the drug and crime problems that led to his/her arrest and participation in drug court. (Research staff inadvertently opened the focus groups in a manner mimicking self-help group meetings.) The comments made by participants in each location suggested that these drug courts were enrolling persons with serious histories of substance abuse, daily use of “hard” drugs, and a fair amount of prior experience in the criminal justice system. Drugs of choice varied by location, and participants were at various stages of the respective drug court programs. With the exception of the Brooklyn focus groups, in which graduates were well represented, most groups included few graduates.


question graphicWhat drugs were you using at the time of your arrest and how long have you used drugs?

answer graphicSites differed somewhat in drugs most commonly preferred by participants as their primary drugs of abuse. Poly-drug use was common. Among Brooklyn participants, crack cocaine seemed the most frequently used, though heroin use was freely described. Among Las Vegas participants, methamphetamines were commonly cited as well as cocaine and combinations of cocaine and marijuana. In Miami and Portland, crack and powder cocaine were prevalent among focus group members. In San Bernardino, cocaine and methamphetamines were most frequently reported as drugs of choice by group members. Seattle drug court participants reported heroin to be their primary drug of abuse notably more often than participants in the other sites.

Click here for excerpts of comments from focus group participants.



question graphicWhy did you choose to enter drug court?


answer graphicAcross all sites, most focus group participants said that they chose treatment court to avoid incarceration. In Brooklyn, at least one participant said that concerns for his family motivated him to enter the drug court. Las Vegas participants opted for drug court to avoid incarceration, criminal records, and family consequences. Miami participants appreciated the opportunity for a “clean record” that drug court gave them. Portland focus group participants said that “getting clean” was a powerful incentive to try the drug court program; another incentive that was mentioned was being allowed to maintain contact with or custody of children. In San Bernardino, focus group participants also stressed family reasons for entering drug court. Some Seattle participants said they entered drug court because they needed help and treatment (“free methadone” in particular).

Click here for excerpts of comments from focus group participants.



question graphicHow many of you have been in drug treatment before entering drug court?


answer graphicWe asked drug court participants in each location about their prior treatment experience. The purpose of this question was not so much to produce an accurate empirical estimate of treatment history, but rather to develop a sense of the extent to which individuals entering the various drug courts were new to treatment or were veterans of prior treatment programs, in or out of criminal justice. Group members’ treatment histories varied, with Seattle and Brooklyn participants reporting greater exposure to prior drug treatment programs. However, it appeared that each jurisdiction included a mix of two groups of participants: those with no prior treatment experience and those who had been treated before without positive results. The different backgrounds of participants meant that some reacted to the treatment regimen with no prior experience for comparison (except not being treated) and some compared it to other treatment programs.

Previous Home Next


An Honest Chance: Perspectives on Drug Courts April 2002