|
II. Drug Histories and Motivation for Entering Drug Court
Each focus group session began with an introduction of the group members
and discussion of their substance abuse historiesthe stage each
had reached in the drug court treatment process as well as the drug and
crime problems that led to his/her arrest and participation in drug court.
(Research staff inadvertently opened the focus groups in a manner mimicking
self-help group meetings.) The comments made by participants in each location
suggested that these drug courts were enrolling persons with serious histories
of substance abuse, daily use of hard drugs, and a fair amount
of prior experience in the criminal justice system. Drugs of choice varied
by location, and participants were at various stages of the respective
drug court programs. With the exception of the Brooklyn focus groups,
in which graduates were well represented, most groups included few graduates.
What
drugs were you using at the time of your arrest and how long have you
used drugs?
Sites
differed somewhat in drugs most commonly preferred by participants as
their primary drugs of abuse. Poly-drug use was common. Among Brooklyn
participants, crack cocaine seemed the most frequently used, though heroin
use was freely described. Among Las Vegas participants, methamphetamines
were commonly cited as well as cocaine and combinations of cocaine and
marijuana. In Miami and Portland, crack and powder cocaine were prevalent
among focus group members. In San Bernardino, cocaine and methamphetamines
were most frequently reported as drugs of choice by group members. Seattle
drug court participants reported heroin to be their primary drug of abuse
notably more often than participants in the other sites.
Click here for excerpts of comments from focus
group participants.
Why
did you choose to enter drug court?
Across
all sites, most focus group participants said that they chose treatment
court to avoid incarceration. In Brooklyn, at least one participant said
that concerns for his family motivated him to enter the drug court. Las
Vegas participants opted for drug court to avoid incarceration, criminal
records, and family consequences. Miami participants appreciated the opportunity
for a clean record that drug court gave them. Portland focus
group participants said that getting clean was a powerful
incentive to try the drug court program; another incentive that was mentioned
was being allowed to maintain contact with or custody of children. In
San Bernardino, focus group participants also stressed family reasons
for entering drug court. Some Seattle participants said they entered drug
court because they needed help and treatment (free methadone
in particular).
Click here for excerpts of comments from focus
group participants.
How many of you have been in drug treatment before entering drug court?
We
asked drug court participants in each location about their prior treatment
experience. The purpose of this question was not so much to produce an
accurate empirical estimate of treatment history, but rather to develop
a sense of the extent to which individuals entering the various drug courts
were new to treatment or were veterans of prior treatment programs, in
or out of criminal justice. Group members treatment histories varied,
with Seattle and Brooklyn participants reporting greater exposure to prior
drug treatment programs. However, it appeared that each jurisdiction included
a mix of two groups of participants: those with no prior treatment experience
and those who had been treated before without positive results. The different
backgrounds of participants meant that some reacted to the treatment regimen
with no prior experience for comparison (except not being treated) and
some compared it to other treatment programs.
|
| An Honest
Chance: Perspectives on Drug Courts |
April
2002 |
|