Table of Contents
Foreword
Acknowledgments
Introduction
A Response to Youth At Risk
Some Juvenile Crime Statistics are Down
Justice Focus on Prevention Strategies
Mentoring is Not New
Mentoring Addresses Risk Factors
Mentoring Supports and Enhances Protective Factors
Mentoring Holds Promise
OJJDP’s Response to the Need
JUMP Project Descriptions
JUMP Projects Target Multiple Goals
Community Collaboration is a Key Feature of JUMP Projects
JUMP Project Activities Vary
Training and Supervision is a Key JUMP Project Component
Grantees Find Creative Solutions to Barriers to Project Success
Profile of Youth Being Served
Youth Being Served Vary Widely
JUMP Projects Address Multiple Risk Factors
Characteristics of JUMP Mentors
Mentors Represent a Wide Range of Demographic Characteristics
Mentor Education and Work History Varies
Mentors Receive Structured Training
The Mentoring Relationship
Waiting Time for a Match is Relatively Brief
Most Projects Use Gender as a Matching Criteria
Race and Ethnicity are Match Considerations
Match Longevity Reflects Project Models
The Mentoring Promise
Youth and Mentors View their Mentoring Experience as Positive
Youth and Mentors Believe that Mentoring Helped
Match Characteristics Affect Perceived Benefits
Next Steps
References
Appendices:
JUMP Grant Awards by State
Summary of JUMP Grant Awards
JUMP Grantee Locations
Additional Resources
Previous
Contents
Next
1998 Report to Congress: Juvenile Mentoring Program
OJJDP Report
December 1998