Most adjudicated delinquency cases in 1998 resulted in residential placement or formal probation

Probation was more likely than residential placement

In 26% of adjudicated delinquency cases, the court ordered the youth to residential placement such as a training school, treatment center, boot camp, drug treatment or private placement facility, or group home. In 58% of adjudicated delinquency cases, probation was the most severe sanction ordered.

Once adjudicated, females were less likely to be ordered to residential placement than were males, and white youth were less likely than were black youth or youth of other races. Demographic patterns in the use of residential placement and probation, however, do not control for criminal histories and other risk factors related to dispositional decisions and increased severity of sanctions.

Percentage of adjudicated delinquency cases, 1998:

Characteristic Residential
placement
Formal
probation

All cases     26%     58%
Gender       
  Male    27   57
  Female 20 63
Race
  White 24 58
   Black 30 57
  Other races 25 57
Age
  12 and younger 16 67
  13 23 63
  14 26 60
  15 28 58
  16 28 55
  17 and older 25 53

Note: All racial groups include Hispanics.



In 1998, residential placement or formal probation was ordered in
84% of delinquency cases; in 1989, the proportion was 86%


    Percentage of
adjudicated delinquency cases

    Residential placement
Formal probation
  Most serious offense 1989 1998 1989 1998

   Delinquency 31% 26% 55% 58%
  Person offenses 33 27 54 58
     Criminal homicide 64 51 33 39
     Forcible rape 46 40 47 45
     Robbery 45 43 43 47
     Aggravated assault 33 30 54 56
     Simple assault 28 23 58 61
     Other violent sex offenses 29 33 61 55
     Other person offenses 26 21 59 61
  Property offenses 27 24 57 59
     Burglary 34 29 57 59
     Larceny-theft 22 22 59 61
     Motor vehicle theft 36 39 51 52
     Arson 27 25 58 57
     Vandalism 18 17 61 62
     Trespassing 23 20 55 60
     Stolen property offenses 31 30 56 52
     Other property offenses 25 16 58 64
  Drug law violations 36 23 54 59
  Public order offenses 38 28 50 54
     Weapons offenses 27 26 63 62
     Obstruction of justice 49 36 45 51
     Disorderly conduct 20 15 58 64
     Liquor law violations 18 9 57 52
     Nonviolent sex offenses 37 34 56 58
     Other public order offenses 23 13 49 46
  Violent Crime Index* 39 35 49 52
  Property Crime Index** 29 26 57 59

  • Cases involving youth adjudicated for serious person offenses, such as homicide, rape, or robbery, were most likely to result in residential placement.

  • The relatively high residential placement rate for public order cases stems from that category's inclusion of certain obstruction of justice offenses that have a high likelihood of placement (e.g., escapes from confinement and violations of probation or parole).

    *The FBI's Violent Crime Index includes criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

    **The FBI's Property Crime Index includes burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson.

    Source: Author's adaptation of Puzzanchera et al.'s Juvenile Court Statistics 1998.

Residential placement and probation caseloads increased between 1989 and 1998

The total number of delinquency cases in which youth were placed out of the home (including informal/voluntary and formal placements) rose 41% between 1989 and 1998, from 125,700 to 176,700. The number of adjudicated cases ordered to residential placement increased 37% in that period, from 119,700 to 163,800.

The total number of delinquency cases receiving probation (either formal or informal) as the most severe initial disposition increased 56% between 1989 and 1998, from 425,900 to 665,500. The number of cases adjudicated and ordered to formal probation increased 73% in that time, from 211,400 to 366,100. The growth in probation caseloads was greater than the growth in delinquency caseloads at referral (44%) and adjudication (65%).

In addition, an increasing number of youth received other sanctions (e.g., community service, restitution) as their most severe disposition. Cases receiving other sanctions represented 17% of cases disposed in 1998. The majority (77%) of such cases were handled informally. Overall, the number of cases receiving other sanctions as their most severe disposition increased 61% from 1989 to 1998. The number of adjudicated cases receiving other sanctions as their most severe disposition rose 85% in this time, from 38,400 to 71,000.

Probation conditions are designed to control and rehabilitate

Probation is the oldest and most widely used community-based corrections program. Probation is used both for first-time, low-risk offenders and as an alternative to institutional confinement for more serious offenders. During a period of probation supervision, a juvenile offender remains in the community and can continue normal activities such as school and work. However, the juvenile must comply with certain conditions.



The profiles of adjudicated cases ordered to residential placement
and those ordered to probation changed between 1989 and 1998

    Percentage of residential placement cases
Percentage of formal probation cases
  Characteristic 1989 1998 1989 1998  

  Most serious offense    100%    100%   100%   100%  
    Person 19 24 17 23  
    Property 50 41 59 45  
    Drugs 9 11 8 12  
    Public order 22 24 16 21  
  Gender   100%   100%   100%   100%  
    Male 88 85 85 79  
    Female 12 15 15 21  
  Race   100%   100%   100%   100%  
    White 60 61 63 66  
    Black 36 36 33 31  
    Other races 4 3 4 3  
  Age   100%   100%   100%   100%  
    12 and younger 5 4 8 8  
    13 9 9 10 10  
    14 17 17 17 17  
    15 25 25 23 23  
    16 26 27 24 24  
    17 and older 18 19 18 18  

  • Compared with 1989, the profiles of residential placement and probation cases in 1998 contained greater proportions of person offenses and females.

  • Compared with the profile of cases that resulted in residential placement in 1998, cases that resulted in formal probation involved a greater proportion of property offenses (45% versus 41%), females (21% versus 15%), whites (66% versus 61%), and youth age 13 or younger (18% versus 13%).

    Note: Detail may not total 100% because of rounding. Juveniles of Hispanic ethnicity can be of any race, but most are included in the white racial category.

    Source: Author's adaptation of Puzzanchera et al.'s Juvenile Court Statistics 1998.

This compliance may be voluntary: the youth agrees to conditions in lieu of formal adjudication. Or compliance may be mandatory following adjudication: the youth is formally ordered to a term of probation and must comply with the conditions established by the court. More than half (55%) of juvenile probation dispositions in 1998 were formal (i.e., enacted under court order following adjudication).

In addition to being required to meet regularly with a probation officer, a juvenile may be ordered to adhere to a curfew, complete a specified period of community service, or pay restitution. More serious offenders may be placed on intensive supervision requiring more frequent contact with their probation officer and stricter conditions. Typically, probation can be revoked if the juvenile violates the probation conditions. If probation is revoked, the court may reconsider its disposition and impose stricter sanctions.


Previous Contents Next

Juveniles in Court OJJDP National Report Series Bulletin
June 2003