Most states had fewer juvenile offenders held in residential placement facilities in 2002 than in 2000
From 2000 to 2002,
the number of juvenile
offenders in custody
decreased in 36 states
On average, these states held 13% fewer
juvenile offenders on the 2002 census date
than on the 2000 census date. The decline
ranged from more than 50% in some
states (Connecticut and Vermont) to less
than 5% in others (Alabama, Nevada,
Oklahoma, and Rhode Island).
Among the 12 states that had more juveniles
in residential placement in 2002 than
in 2000, the average growth was 11%. Half
of these states had increases of 15% or
more (Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Montana,
New Hampshire, and North Dakota). With
the exception of Florida, the absolute increases
in these states were small. Floridas
juvenile offender population increased more
than 4 times the other five states combined.
The number of juvenile offenders in placement in juvenile facilities nationwide decreased 7% between 2000 and 2002 |
| |
Percent change in
juvenile offenders in custody |
|
Percent change in
juvenile offenders in custody |
| State |
Total |
Public |
Private |
State |
Total |
Public |
Private |
|
| U.S. Total* |
7% |
10% |
1% |
Missouri |
1% |
3% |
9% |
| Alabama |
3 |
11 |
8 |
Montana |
18 |
2 |
52 |
| Alaska |
19 |
16 |
27 |
Nebraska |
7 |
11 |
3 |
| Arizona |
16 |
15 |
20 |
Nevada |
1 |
15 |
28 |
| Arkansas |
15 |
28 |
52 |
New Hampshire |
21 |
11 |
39 |
| California |
10 |
11 |
0 |
New Jersey |
10 |
9 |
31 |
| Colorado |
0 |
17 |
20 |
New Mexico |
9 |
17 |
123 |
| Connecticut |
51 |
73 |
8 |
New York |
12 |
19 |
3 |
| Delaware |
8 |
1 |
43 |
North Carolina |
17 |
30 |
31 |
| Dist. of Columbia |
3 |
15 |
14 |
North Dakota |
21 |
25 |
17 |
| Florida |
17 |
7 |
36 |
Ohio |
8 |
7 |
17 |
| Georgia |
18 |
14 |
32 |
Oklahoma |
2 |
19 |
27 |
| Hawaii |
8 |
7 |
13 |
Oregon |
10 |
11 |
5 |
| Idaho |
20 |
14 |
42 |
Pennsylvania |
0 |
2 |
1 |
| Illinois |
14 |
17 |
16 |
Rhode Island |
4 |
6 |
17 |
| Indiana |
3 |
7 |
4 |
South Carolina |
8 |
10 |
5 |
| Iowa |
19 |
5 |
27 |
South Dakota |
7 |
8 |
3 |
| Kansas |
6 |
3 |
14 |
Tennessee |
9 |
20 |
6 |
| Kentucky |
4 |
8 |
11 |
Texas |
0 |
4 |
12 |
| Louisiana |
11 |
13 |
4 |
Utah |
5 |
4 |
12 |
| Maine |
7 |
2 |
31 |
Vermont |
61 |
4 |
74 |
| Maryland |
18 |
11 |
25 |
Virginia |
8 |
6 |
26 |
| Massachusetts |
5 |
20 |
4 |
Washington |
6 |
9 |
37 |
| Michigan |
27 |
24 |
29 |
West Virginia |
3 |
17 |
19 |
| Minnesota |
12 |
10 |
13 |
Wisconsin |
12 |
7 |
19 |
| Mississippi |
15 |
24 |
|
Wyoming |
10 |
18 |
34 |
In 23 states, reductions in public facility populations drove
declines in the number of juvenile offenders in custody
- In nine of these states, this drop
occurred despite an increase in the
number of juveniles held in private
facilities.
- Six states experienced growth in
their juvenile offender population
between 2000 and 2002 driven by
growth in their private facility population.
In four of these states, this
growth occurred despite reductions
in the number of juveniles held in
public facilities.
|
|
| Note: State is the state where the facility is located. Offenders sent to out-of-state facilities are counted
in the state where the facility is located, not the state where their offense occurred.
*U.S. total includes nine tribal facilities. These tribal facilities were located in Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.
Source: Authors analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].
|
The decline in juvenile
arrests may explain
the decline in youth in
custody
Juvenile arrest statistics are a measure of
the flow of youth into the justice system.
Nationwide, the juvenile arrest rate peaked
in 1996 and has declined substantially
since then (29%). The juvenile arrest rate
dropped 7% between 2000 and 2002.
|
|
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002: Selected Findings |
OJJDP National Report
Series Bulletin
June 2006 |
|