Facility crowding affects a substantial proportion of youth in custody

Many juvenile offenders are in facilities with more residents than standard beds

Facilities reported both the number of standard beds and the number of occupied makeshift beds they had on the census date. Occupancy rates provide the broadest assessment of the adequacy of living space. Although occupancy rate standards have not been established, as a facility’s occupancy approaches 100%, operational functioning may be impaired.

Crowding occurs when the number of residents occupying all or part of a facility exceeds some predetermined limit based on square footage, utility use, or even fire codes. While an imperfect measure of crowding, comparing the number of residents to the number of standard beds gives a sense of the crowding problem in a facility. Even without relying on makeshift beds, however, a facility may be crowded. For example, using standard beds in an infirmary for youth who are not sick or beds in seclusion for youth who have not committed infractions may indicate crowding problems.

Thirty-six percent of facilities said that the number of residents they held on the 2002 census date put them at or over the capacity of their standard beds or that they relied on some makeshift beds. These facilities held more than 39,300 residents, the vast majority of whom were offenders younger than 21. Thus, 34% of all residents held on the census date and 34% of offenders younger than 21 were held in facilities operating at or above their standard bed capacity. In comparison, in 2000 such facilities held 40% of all residents. In 2002, facilities that reported being over capacity (having fewer standard beds than they had residents or relying on makeshift beds) accounted for 6% of facilities, but they held 14% of juvenile offenders.

Compared with other types of facilities, public detention centers and
reception/diagnostic centers were more likely to be at or over standard bed capacity
  Percent of facilities at
their standard bed capacity
Percent of facilities over
their standard bed capacity
Facility Type Total Public Private Total Public Private

Total    30%    16%    39%    6%   15%   1%
Detention center 14 10 34 18   21 2
Shelter 17 15 18 2   5 0
Reception/ diagnostic center 26 19 34 10   17 2
Group home 43 29 46 1   3 1
Boot camp 16 13 22 5   5 6
Ranch/ wilderness camp 25 26 24 2   2 2
Training school 23 19 31 9 13 1

Note: A single bed is counted as one standard bed and a bunk bed is counted as two standard beds. Makeshift beds (e.g., cots, roll-out beds, mat­tresses, and sofas) are not counted as standard beds. Facilities are counted as over capacity if they reported more residents than standard beds or if they reported any occupied makeshift beds. Facilities could select more than one facility type category. Totals include data from 9 tribal facilities.

Source: Author's analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].

Larger facilities were more likely than smaller facilities to be crowded
Facility size Number of
facilities
Percent of facilities at or over their standard bed capacity
Mean number of
makeshift beds
>100% 100% >100%

Total 2,964      36%    30%      6% 10
1–10 residents 1,003   39 38  1   2
11–20 residents 648 37 34  3   3
21–50 residents 704 34 24 10   7
51–100 residents 350 31 17 14 11
101–200 residents 171 37 20 16 21
201–972 residents  88 34 17 17 18

Note: A single bed is counted as one standard bed and a bunk bed is counted as two standard beds. Makeshift beds (e.g., cots, roll-out beds, mattresses, and sofas) are not counted as standard beds. Facilities are counted as over capacity if they reported more residents than standard beds or if they reported any occupied makeshift beds.

Source: Author's analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].

Public facilities were more likely than private facilities to be crowded

Among publicly operated facilities, 15% were over standard bed capacity or had residents occupying makeshift beds on the 2002 census date. For privately operated facilities, the proportion was 1%. A large proportion of private facilities (39%), however, said they were operating at 100% capacity.

State-operated public facilities had a somewhat greater proportion of facilities that were over capacity (17%) than did locally operated public facilities (13%).

Facility operation Percent of facilities at or
over their standard bed capacity
>100% 100% >100%

Total    36%    30%     6%
Public 31 16 15
   State 37 20 17
   Local 26 13 13
Private 40 39   1
Note: Totals include data from nine tribal facilities.

Use of makeshift beds varied widely

More than 250 facilities reported having occupied makeshift beds, averaging 10 such beds per facility. Many facilities rely on makeshift beds, yet many operate well below standard bed capacity. On average, there were seven unoccupied standard beds per facility. This average masks a wide range: one facility with 162 residents had 72 standard beds and 90 residents without standard beds; one facility with 1,272 standard beds had 972 residents, leaving 300 unoccupied beds.

Nationwide, 1,069 of 2,964 juvenile facilities (36%) were at or
over standard capacity or relied on makeshift beds
State   Total facilities Number of facilities under, at, or over capacity
Percent of juvenile offenders in facilities at or over capacity
  Total facilities Number of facilities under, at, or over capacity
Percent of juvenile offenders in facilities at or over capacity
<100% 100% >100% 100% >100% State <100% 100% >100% 100% >100%

U.S. Total* 2,964 1,894    882 187     20%    14% Missouri 72 48 20   4  27%   7%
Alabama 48 39   7   2   7   9 Montana 24 19 4 1 5 6
Alaska 23 14   5  4 12 59 Nebraska 19 16 1 2 0 33 
Arizona 51 40   9  2   7 16 Nevada 18 11 5 2 39  31 
Arkansas 35 25 10   0 22   0 New Hampshire   8   5 3 0 70  0
California 286 135   136  15 19 10 New Jersey 49 36 5 8 9 31 
Colorado 65 41 16   8 25 36 New Mexico 27 20 4 3 9 15 
Connecticut 26 17   8   1 26   7 New York 221  113   94   14 25  19 
Delaware 6   3   0   3   0 83 North Carolina 66 52 12   2 7 4
District of Columbia 13   9   4   0 14   0 North Dakota 11   5 5 1 28  3
Florida 181 88 83 10 40 11 Ohio 97 58 23   16  12  21 
Georgia 53 27 11 15   8 30 Oklahoma 56 24  32      42  0
Hawaii 5   4   0   1   0 65 Oregon 45 29 13   3 25  8
Idaho 22 17   4   1   6   5 Pennsylvania 179 125 48   6 33  5
Illinois 45 38   6   1   4   2 Rhode Island 14   4 9 1 23  64 
Indiana 95 75 18   2 19   8 South Carolina 38 29 5 4 7 27 
Iowa 65 46 19   0 36   0 South Dakota 22 13 8 1 31  1
Kansas 56 38 16   2 47   5 Tennessee 58 39  16    3 15  13 
Kentucky 50 39 11   0 13   0 Texas 129  86 27  16  11  28 
Louisiana 62 40 19   3 13   5 Utah 47 29 16   2 26  4
Maine 14 10   4   42   0 Vermont 5   3 2 0 28  0
Maryland 43 22 19   2 41 13 Virginia 71 49 13   9 16  18 
Massachusetts 68 20 44   4 59   9 Washington 40 33 2 5 1 18 
Michigan 94 67 24   3 14   4 West Virginia 23 13 6 4 10   24 
Minnesota 100 79 21   0 16   0 Wisconsin 81 69 12   0 29   0
Mississippi 17 14   2   1   2   1 Wyoming 21 20 1 0 2 0

Note: A single bed is counted as one standard bed and a bunk bed is counted as two standard beds. Makeshift beds (e.g., cots, roll-out beds, mat­tresses, and sofas) are not counted as standard beds. Facilities are counted as over capacity if they reported more residents than standard beds or if they reported any occupied makeshift beds. State is the state where the facility is located. Offenders sent to out-of-state facilities are counted in the state where the facility is located, not the state where their offense occurred.

* U.S. total includes 9 tribal facilities. These tribal facilities were located in Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota. One of the 9 tribal facilities held more residents than it had standard beds.

Source: Author's analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].



Previous Contents Next


Juvenile Residential Facility Census,
2002: Selected Findings
OJJDP National Report Series Bulletin
June 2006