Most juvenile offenders are held in facilities that evaluate all youth for suicide risk on their first day

Facilities that screen all youth for suicide risk hold 81% of the juvenile offenders in custody

As part of the information collected on mental health services, the JRFC questionnaire asks facilities about their procedures regarding screening youth for suicide risk.

In 2002, 68% of facilities that reported information on suicide screening said that they evaluated all youth for suicide risk. An additional 17% said that they evaluated some youth. The proportion of facilities reporting that all youth are evaluated for suicide risk increased 6 percentage points from 2000 to 2002. Some facilities said they didn’t evaluate any youth for suicide risk (15%).

Suicide screening 2000 2002

Total facilities 3,061 2,964
Facilities reporting 2,754 2,837
All reporting facilities       100%       100%
   All youth screened     62     68
   Some youth screened     24     17
   No youth screened     15     15

In 2002, a greater proportion of public than private facilities said that they evaluated all youth for suicide risk (79% vs. 60%).

Larger facilities were more likely than smaller facilities to screen all
youth for suicide risk and less likely to not screen any youth in 2002
    Facility size based on resident population
Suicide screening Total 1–10 11–20 21–50 51–100 101–200 200+

Total facilities 2,964    1,003    648   704   350   171   88
Facilities reporting 2,837    957 614   673   339   167   87
All reporting facilities   100%   100%  100%  100%  100%  100%  100%
   All youth screened 68 52 70 78 76 79 90
   Some youth screened 17 23 15 13 16 11  9
   No youth screened 15 25 15 9   8 10  1

Detention centers, reception/diagnostic centers, and training schools were more
likely than other types of facilities to screen all youth for suicide risk in 2002
  Facility type
Suicide screening Detention
center
Shelter Reception/
diagnostic
center
Group
home
Boot camp Ranch/
wilderness
camp
Training
school

Total facilities 769 289 104 1,136 56 157 389
Facilities reporting 754 280 101 1,074 56 153 386
All reporting facilities   100%   100%   100%   100%   100%   100%   100%
   All youth screened 84 57 85 55 68 62 82
   Some youth screened 10 24 12 20 16 13 12
   No youth screened  6 19  3 24 16 25   6

Source: Author's analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].

JRFC asks facilities about their suicide screening procedures

After arrival at this facility, are any young persons evaluated to determine whether they are at risk for suicide?

If yes . . . Are all young persons evaluated after arrival in this facility to determine whether they are at risk for suicide?

If not all . . . Which young persons are evaluated for suicide risk?

When are young persons evaluated for suicide risk?

Who evaluates young persons for suicide risk?

Of the 476 facilities in 2002 that said they screened some but not all youth, 99% said they screened youth who display or communicate suicide risk; 47% said they also screened those who were known to have a prior suicide attempt; 11% said they also screened other groups of youth (e.g., youth with no mental health record available or youth who came to the facility directly from home rather than from another facility).

In 2002, among facilities that reported suicide screening information, those that screened all youth for suicide risk held 81% of juvenile offenders who were in residential placement—up from 78% in 2000. An additional 12% of juvenile offenders in 2002 were in facilities that screened some youth.

Suicide screening 2000 2002

Total juvenile offenders 110,284    102,388      
Offenders in reporting facilities 104,956    100,110        
Total offenders       100%   100%
   All youth screened    78 81
   Some youth screened    16 12
   No youth screened      6   7

The most common approach to suicide risk evaluations in 2002 was
to screen all youth on the day they arrive at the facility
  Number of juvenile facilities
As a percent of facilities that
screened for suicide risk
    Suicide screening
  Suicide screening
When youth
are screened
All facilities All screened Some screened Facilities that screened All screened Some screened

Total facilities 2,964 1,925 476   100%    80%  20%
   By end of first day 1,581 1,454 127 66 61 5
   Day two through
      end of first week
  368   271   97 15 11 4
After first week    94    67   27   4   3 1
Other  358  133 225 15   6 9
No youth screened
   (or not reported)
 563

In 2002, 7 in 10 juvenile offenders in facilities that screened for
suicide risk were in facilities that conducted suicide screenings
on all youth on the day they arrived at the facility
  Number of juvenile offenders
As a percent of juvenile
offenders in facilities that
screened for suicide risk
    Suicide screening
Facilities that screened Suicide screening
When youth are screened All facilities All screened Some screened All screened Some screened

Total juvenile
   offenders
102,388    81,486 11,577     100%    88%  12%
By end of first day 68,853  65,343 3,510 74 70 4
Day two through end
   of first week
11,121  9,075 2,046 12 10 2
After first week 3,714 2,838    876   4   3 1
Other 9,375 4,230 5,145 10   5 6
No youth screened
   (or not reported)
9,325 

  • Two-thirds of facilities (66%) that reported screening for suicide risk said they conducted the screenings on youth's first day at the facility. Facilities that said they screened all youth and did so on the youth's first day made up 61% of facilities that screened for suicide risk; they held 70% of the juvenile offenders in facilities that reported suicide screening.

  • Other facilities that reported they screened all youth said they conducted their suicide screenings during youth's first week at the facility. Taken together, facilities that screened all youth on the first day and those that screened all youth by the end of the first week accounted for more than 7 of 10 facilities that reported suicide screen­ing. Taken together, these facilities held 80% of juvenile offenders who were in facilities reporting that they screened for suicide risk.

  • A small proportion of facilities conducted suicide risk screenings only after the youth had been in the facility for a week. Some facilities indicated that they conducted screenings within other time limits. A number of facilities said they conducted suicide risk evaluations “at intake” but did not specify a particular timeframe. Some facilities said such screenings occurred before the youth was admitted, as part of pre-intake assessments; however, most said they made an evaluation of suicide risk based on youth's behavior or staff recommendation rather than by a particular deadline. Seven percent of facilities that screened for suicide risk used this “as needed” approach in addition to initial screenings.

—Not applicable
Source: Author's analysis of Juvenile Residential Facility Census 2002 [machine-readable data file].

Most facilities use professional mental health staff to conduct suicide screening

More than half (56%) of facilities that screened some or all youth for suicide risk reported that the screenings were conducted by mental health professionals with at least a master’s degree in psychology or social work. Some facilities also used counselors to conduct screenings. Fewer than 1 facility in 5 used neither mental health professionals nor counselors trained by a mental health professional to conduct suicide screenings.

Few facilities experience suicides or serious attempts

Eight facilities reported having a resident die of suicide during the year, and 114 reported a suicide attempt during the month prior to the census that was serious enough to require hospitalization. Together, this was 122 facilities—fewer than 4% of all facilities. Facilities identified only as “detention centers” were the most common type of facility to report a suicide or serious suicide attempt. Facilities identified only as a “group home/ halfway house” were the second most common type of facility to report a suicide or serious attempt. Facilities identified only as a “training school/long-term secure” facility (with no other purpose) constituted 8 of the 122 with a suicide or serious attempt.

Facilities reporting a suicide or a pastmonth attempt requiring hospitalization

Facility type Single-purpose Multi-purpose*

Total 97 25
Detention 37  6
Shelter  4 10
Reception/diagnostic  1  7
Group home 22 10
Boot camp  1  1
Ranch/wilderness camp  5  1
Training school  8 15
Other type 19  9

* Counts sum to more than the total number of facilities because facilities could select more than one facility type category.



Previous Contents Next


Juvenile Residential Facility Census,
2002: Selected Findings
OJJDP National Report Series Bulletin
June 2006