|
State variations in juvenile arrest rates may reflect differences in juvenile law-violating behavior, police
behavior, and/or community standards
| State |
Reporting Coverage |
2000 Juvenile Arrest Rate* |
|
Violent Crime Index |
Property Crime Index |
Drug
Abuse | Weapons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| United States | 72%† |
330 |
1,686 | 649 |
116 |
| Alabama | 71 | 149 |
822 | 264 | 59 |
| Alaska | 91 | 243 |
2,565 | 517 |
101 |
| Arizona | 91 | 294 |
2,185 |
894 |
81 |
| Arkansas | 86 | 183 |
1,477 | 321 | 85 |
| California | 100 | 405 |
1,411 | 583 | 160 |
| Colorado | 76 | 238 |
2,628 | 805 |
188 |
| Connecticut | 76 | 279 |
1,555 | 671 | 106 |
| Delaware | 50 | 1,053 |
3,571 |
1,387 | 262 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | NA |
NA | NA | NA |
| Florida | 98 | 612 |
2,443 | 884 |
109 |
| Georgia | 48 | 272 |
1,381 | 490 |
115 |
| Hawaii | 88 | 247 |
1,744 | 422 | 45 |
| Idaho | 99 | 176 |
2,461 | 483 | 132 |
| Illinois | 23 | 939 |
2,763 | 2,868 | 427 |
| Indiana | 64 | 350 |
1,722 | 523 | 44 |
| Iowa | 88 | 244 |
1,943 | 413 | 47 |
| Kansas | 0 | NA |
NA | NA | NA |
| Kentucky | 6 | 206 |
1,984 | 623 | 73 |
| Louisiana | 69 | 408 |
1,810 | 568 | 89 |
| Maine | 98 | 121 |
1,907 | 619 | 28 |
| Maryland | 84 | 528 |
1,904 | 1,281 | 188 |
| Massachusetts | 76 | 449 |
686 | 419 | 39 |
| Michigan | 85 | 149 |
1,092 | 342 |
56 |
| Minnesota | 94 | 283 |
2,174 |
889 | 153 |
| Mississippi | 50 | 147 |
1,945 | 617 | 93 |
| Missouri | 52% | 329 |
2,229 | 789 |
125 |
| Montana | 38 | 379 |
1,883 | 333 |
58 |
| Nebraska | 91 | 118 |
2,483 | 719 |
106 |
| Nevada | 98 | 254 |
2,409 |
777 | 191 |
| New Hampshire | 59 | 96 |
1,022 | 690 | 34 |
| New Jersey | 97 | 360 |
1,269 | 876 | 172 |
| New Mexico | 63 | 281 |
1,467 | 581 | 143 |
| New York | 35 | 315 |
1,437 | 635 | 96 |
| North Carolina | 79 | 317 |
1,697 | 507 | 159 |
| North Dakota | 89 | 32 |
2,220 | 354 | 40 |
| Ohio | 52 | 218 |
1,488 | 422 | 86 |
| Oklahoma | 100 | 248 |
1,675 | 500 | 90 |
| Oregon | 81 | 201 |
2,503 | 653 |
94 |
| Pennsylvania | 75 | 462 |
1,451 | 557 | 100 |
| Rhode Island | 95 | 274 |
1,430 | 641 | 108 |
| South Carolina | 28 | 322 |
1,700 | 682 | 118 |
| South Dakota | 79 | 138 |
2,220 | 675 | 93 |
| Tennessee | 69 | 176 |
1,044 | 423 | 65 |
| Texas | 96 | 215 |
1,553 | 601 | 69 |
| Utah | 70 | 213 |
2,888 | 580 | 143 |
| Vermont | 81 | 57 |
926 | 312 | 15 |
| Virginia | 73 | 158 |
1,006 | 398 | 102 |
| Washington | 69 | 328 |
2,933 | 598 | 153 |
| West Virginia | 49 | 85 |
884 | 185 | 27 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | NA |
NA | NA | NA |
| Wyoming | 100 | 159 |
1,895 | 765 | 88 |
* Throughout this Bulletin, juvenile arrest rates are calculated by dividing the number of arrests of persons ages 10–17 by the number of persons
ages 10–17 in the population. In this table only, arrest rate is defined as the number of arrests of persons under age 18 for every 100,000 persons
ages 10–17. Juvenile arrests (arrests of youth under age 18) reported at the State level in
Crime in the United States cannot be disaggregated
into more detailed age categories so that the arrest of persons under age 10 can be excluded in the rate calculation. Therefore, there is a slight
inconsistency in this table between the age range for the arrests (birth through age 17) and the age range for the population (ages 10–17) that are
the basis of a State’s juvenile arrest rates. This inconsistency is slight because just 2% of all juvenile arrests involved youth under age 10. This inconsistency
is preferable to the distortion of arrest rates that would be introduced were the population base for the arrest rate to incorporate the large
volume of children under age 10 in a State’s population.
† The reporting coverage for the total United States in this table (72%) includes all States reporting arrests of persons under age 18. This is greater
than the coverage in the rest of the Bulletin (65%) because Florida was able to provide arrest counts of persons under age 18 but was not able to
provide the age detail required to support most other presentations in Crime in the United States 2000.
NA = Crime in the United States 2000 reported no arrest counts for this State.
Interpretation cautions: Arrest rates are calculated by dividing the number of youth arrests made in the year by the number of youth living
in reporting jurisdictions. While juvenile arrest rates in part reflect juvenile behavior, many other factors can affect the size of these
rates. For example, jurisdictions that arrest a relatively large number of nonresident juveniles would have higher arrest rates than jurisdictions
where resident youth behave in an identical manner. Therefore, jurisdictions that are vacation destinations or regional centers
for economic activity may have arrest rates that reflect more than the behavior of their resident youth. Other factors that influence the
magnitude of arrest rates in a given area include the attitudes of its citizens toward crime, the policies of the jurisdiction’s law enforcement
agencies, and the policies of other components of the justice system.
Consequently, comparisons of juvenile arrest rates
across States, while informative, should be made with caution. In most States, not all law enforcement agencies report their arrest
data to the FBI. Rates for these States are necessarily based on partial information. If the reporting law enforcement agencies in these
States are not representative of the entire State, then the rates will be biased.
Therefore, reported arrest rates for States with less
than complete reporting coverage may not be accurate.
Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI’s Crime in the United States 2000
(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2001),
tables 5 and 69, and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census’ Census
2000 Summary File 1, table P14, Sex by Age for the Population
Under 20 Years [Web site data files].
|