OVC ArchiveOVC
This file is provided for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Please select www.ovc.gov to access current information.
 

Line
Notes

OVC does not exercise control over external Web sites.
Read the Web site links disclaimer.

1. Study of Criminal Restitution in Colorado (1999). Denver, CO: Colorado Legislative Counsel. Table 2, p. 18. The study includes numerous caveats to this figure, including that the data reflect an analysis of payment over time and payments on many orders are continuing and that many of the offenders ordered to pay are currently incarcerated and not expected to make significant payments until release or placement in a work program (see p. 16).

2. CAL. PENAL CODE § 1202.4 (Deering 2001).

3. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 60-4305 (2000).

4. 42 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 9728 (West 2000).

5. Id.

6. CAL. PENAL CODE § 155.5 (Deering 2001).

7. CAL. GOV’T CODE § 13967.2 (Deering 2001); FLA. STAT. ANN. § 775.089 (West 2000).

8. WIS. STAT. § 973.20 (2000).

9. N.J. STAT. ANN. § 52:4B-8.1 (West 2001).

10 N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:43-3.1 (West 2001).

11. MICH. STAT. ANN. §§ 28.1073, .2306 (Michie 2000).

12. UTAH CODE JUD. ADMIN. R. 6-303.

13. IOWA CODE § 910.4 (2001).

14. MASS. ANN. LAWS ch. 258B, § 3 (Law. Co-op. 2001).

15. WASH. REV. CODE § 9.94A.030 (2001).

16. WASH. REV. CODE § 9.94A.120 (2001).

17. ALA. CODE § 12-17-225.2 (2001); N.J. STAT. ANN. § 52:4B-8.1 (West 2001).

18. MD. ANN. CODE art. 27, § 810 (2001); WIS. STAT. § 973.05 (2000).

19. IOWA CODE § 622.69 (2001).

20. TENN. CODE ANN. §§ 41-6-301–303 (2001).

21. ARK. STAT. ANN. § 12-29-601 (2001); OKLA. STAT. tit. 57, § 566.1 (2000); WIS. STAT. § 806.025 (2000). In Arkansas and Oklahoma, this is limited to suits against the government.

22. MONT. CODE ANN. § 53-1-107 (2000).

23. IOWA CODE § 904.702 (2001).

24. For example, CAL. PENAL CODE § 1463.009 (Deering 2001); 730 ILL. COMP. STAT. § 5/5-5-6; N.Y. CRIM. PROC. LAW § 420.10 (Consol. 2001); S.C. CODE ANN. § 17-15-15 (Law. Co-op. 2000).

25. People v. Rayburn, 258 Ill. App. 3d 331, 196 Ill. Dec. 598, 630 N.E.2d 533 (3d Dist. 1994).

26. For example, LA. REV. STAT. § 15:840.2 (2000); N.Y. CORRECT. LAW § 860 (Consol. 2001); S.D. CODIFIED LAWS § 24-11A-20 (Michie 2000).

27. For example, N.J. REV. STAT. § 30:4-92 (2001).

28. For example, MICH. STAT. ANN. § 28.1540(7a) (Michie 2000); MINN. STAT. § 241.26 (2000).

29. For example, ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 1330 (West 2000); N.C. GEN. STAT. § 148-32.1 (2000).

30. People v. Frye, 21 Cal. App. 4th 1483, 27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 52 (3rd Dist. 1994). See also People v. Gentry, 28 Cal. App. 4th 1374, 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 37 (1st Dist. 1994). (In making restitution determination, court may consider defendant’s future prison wages in their entirety, as well as possibility of employment on release from prison; defendant’s conclusory statement that a bad back precluded him from prison work was insufficient to show that the defendant could not secure prison employment.)

31. LA. REV. STAT. § 15:840.2 (2000).

32. People v. Clark, 268 Ill. App. 3d 810, 206 Ill. Dec. 585, 645 N.E.2d 590 (4th Dist.), appeal denied, 161 Ill. 2d 531, 208 Ill. Dec. 363, 649 N.E.2d 419 (1995).

33. People v. Lawson, 69 Cal. App. 4th 29, 35, 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 283 (1st App. Dist., Div. 3, 1999).

34. ARK. STAT. ANN. § 5-4-303 (2001).

35. ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 13-902 (2000).

36. KY. REV. STAT. § 439.563 (2001).

37. Fee added to amounts owed by defendant: ALA. CODE § 12-17-225.4 (2001); IOWA CODE § 602.8107 (2001); 42 PA. CONS. STAT. § 9730.1 (2000). Fee paid out of the amount collected: VA. CODE § 19.2-349 (2000).

38. ALA. CODE § 12-17-225.4 (2001).

39. ALA. CODE §§ 12-17-225 to -225.9 (2001).

40. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 75-719 (2000).

41. CAL. PENAL CODE § 3000.05 (Deering 2001); IOWA CODE § 602.8107 (2001); VA. CODE § 19.2-349 (2000).

42. For example, COLO. REV. STAT. § 16-18.5-103 (2000); R.I. GEN. LAWS § 12-28-5.1 (2001).

43. For example, HAW. REV. STAT. § 706-647 (2000). In Maryland, orders from the Circuit Court (felony crimes) are automatically entered as civil judgments, whereas those entered in District Court (misdemeanors) are entered on the victim’s request. MD. ANN. CODE art. 27, § 807 (2001).

44. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 60-4303 (2000).

45. For example, COLO. REV. STAT. § 16-18.5-103 (2000); S.C. CODE ANN. § 17-25-323 (Law. Co-op. 2000); UTAH CODE ANN. §§ 76-3-201, 77-18-6 (2000).

46. For example, DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4101 (2000); GA. CODE ANN. § 42-8-34.2 (2000).

47. “How To Enforce Your Restitution Order as a Civil Judgment,” California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, formerly the California State Board of Control, www.boc.ca.gov.

Previous Contents Next


Restitution: Making It Work, Legal Series Bulletin #5
November 2002
Archive iconThe information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.