U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Philosophical Foundations: Why Do We Incarcerate; Why Do We Release? (From Current Issues in Parole Decisionmaking: Understanding the Past; Shaping the Future, P 19-22, 1988, Peggy B Burke -- See NCJ-114954)

NCJ Number
114957
Author(s)
P B Burke
Date Published
1988
Length
4 pages
Annotation
Understanding the theoretical purposes served by criminal sanctions is crucial for planning, measuring effectiveness, developing policy, and aiding in setting priorities.
Abstract
This understanding is also important because heavy workloads leave paroling authorities with few opportunities to discuss and debate their purposes. The main purposes of criminal sanctions are just deserts, general deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. Proponents of just deserts hold that the punishment should be proportionate to the harm done by the crime and to the blameworthiness of the offender. General deterrence rests on the assumption that those who break the law must be punished as a warning to other potential criminals. Incapacitation aims to take away the offender's opportunity to commit crimes against the public. Finally, rehabilitation sees the causes of crime within the environment of the offender and seeks to bring about changes in the individual to affect future choices about behavior. Although parole boards need not necessarily choose a single goal for their release decisionmaking and supervision responsibilities, it is important to recognize that other parts of the criminal justice system also have responsibilities for these goals and that decisionmakers should be aware of the goals being served.