skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Abstract Database

Document Details


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

How to Obtain Documents

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Click the "Download" button on the Search Results page.


NCJ Number: 230410 Find in a Library
Title: Perspectives on Civil Protective Orders in Domestic Violence Cases: The Rural and Urban Divide
Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:266  Dated:June 2010  Pages:4-8
Series: NIJ Journal
Author(s): Nikki Hawkins
Date Published: June 2010
Page Count: 5
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2005-WG-BX-0008
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article - Designates individual journal articles: as published, reprinted, or online/electronic.
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the impact of civil protective orders (CPOs) against perpetrators of domestic violence on the safety of their victims in five Kentucky jurisdictions.
Abstract: The study findings overall suggest that CPOs are cost-effective in increasing victims’ safety and reducing victims’ fear. CPOs, sometimes known as restraining orders, may cover various situations, such as ordering an assailant to avoid a victim’s home and workplace or forbid any contact with the victim, including by mail or telephone. Urban and rural women victims had similar views of the CPOs’ effectiveness; however, rural women confronted more barriers to getting a CPO and having it enforced, which translated into their experiencing less relief from fear and abuse through CPOs. The study also examined the role of stalking in CPO violations, finding that they were less effective for stalking victims than for other victims of domestic violence. Stalking after the CPO was issued was associated with violence, suggesting that those who stalk their victims are more violent and resistant to compliance with CPOs. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that every dollar spent on the CPO intervention produced $30.75 in avoided costs to society. The State of Kentucky saved approximately $85 million over a 1-year period because of significant declines in domestic abuse and violence. The savings included “relevant costs,” such as service use, legal system use, lost opportunities, and quality-of-life loss. CPO’s effectiveness can be improved by enforcing consequences when violations occur, developing more effective interventions at all levels to counter stalking, and addressing barriers to service access and enforcement. Researchers interviewed 213 women with protective orders in 1 urban (n=77) and 4 rural jurisdictions (n=93). In order to learn about the barriers to getting a CPO, researchers interviewed 188 key participants, including judges, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and court clerks. 1 table and 2 notes
Main Term(s): Female victims
Index Term(s): Anti-stalking laws; Deterrence effectiveness; Domestic assault; Kentucky; NIJ grant-related documents; Restraining orders; Rural area studies; Rural urban comparisons; Rural victims; Stalkers; Stalking; Urban area studies; Victim attitudes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's Web site is provided.
Tell us how you use the Library and the Abstracts Database. Send us your Feedback.