skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 240916 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Implementation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Practitioner Evaluation Toolkit
Author(s): Rebecca Campbell, Ph.D.; Stephanie Townsend, Ph.D.; Deborah Bybee, Ph.D.; Jessica L. Shaw, M.A.; Jenifer Markowitz, N.D., R.N.
Date Published: August 2012
Page Count: 145
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 2009-MU-MU-0002
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is a report on an implementation evaluation of the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Practitioner Evaluation Toolkit, whose purpose is to teach program staff how to evaluate whether prosecution rates for sexual assault cases in their communities have increased due to the implementation of the SANE program.
Abstract: The assessment of the implementation of the SANE Practitioner Evaluation kit involved the selection of six sites with SANE programs (two rural, two mid-sized, and two urban). These sites were provided comprehensive technical assistance for working through the steps in the toolkit, so they could properly evaluate whether their programs were having a beneficial impact on prosecution rates. Feedback from the sites indicates that the technical assistance package was helpful and user-friendly. Participating in this project also contributed to “process use,” meaning that program staff increased their knowledge about evaluation, positive attitudes about evaluation, and organizational commitment to on-going evaluation. In addition, there was substantial evidence of “instrumental use,” which indicates that programs used their substantive findings to create action plans for change in their local communities. Participating in this project also promoted “conceptual use” among program staff, i.e., the results challenged SANE program staff to re-examine their programs. Since the evaluation results in the six sites showed that the majority of sexual assault cases did not result in successful prosecution, program staff reviewed their role in the prosecutorial process. The evaluation also impressed upon SANE staff that their program is only one of many factors that influence the outcomes of sexual assault cases. Low rates of prosecution in sexual assault allegations continue to be a nationwide problem. 12 tables, 69 references, and appended supplementary data and information on the toolkit
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Evaluation criteria; Evaluation techniques; NIJ final report; NIJ grant-related documents; Program evaluation; Sexual assault; Sexual assault victims; Technical assistance resources; Victim medical assistance
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.