skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 247081 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Delivery and Evaluation of Sexual Assault Forensic (SAFE) Training Programs
Author(s): Debra Patterson, Ph.D.; Stella Resko, Ph.D.; Jennifer Pierce-Weeks, R.N.; Rebecca Campbell, Ph.D.
Date Published: March 2014
Page Count: 240
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 2010-NE-BX-K260
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the International Association of Forensic Nurses’ Sexual (IAFN) Assault Forensic Examination (SAFE) training programs.
Abstract: The evaluation’s overall assessment is that the IAFN SAFE training curriculum and blended training model provides a strong foundation that can be built upon to meet the diverse learning needs of clinicians across the Nation. The training includes a didactic portion delivered online over a 12-week period and a 2-day simulated clinical skills workshop. Healthcare clinicians from across the Nation were enrolled in the training (n=198). Of these, 79.3 percent completed the training. Students were more likely to complete the training when they enrolled in the program primarily because of the 2-day clinical component. Students who worked in rural communities were more likely to complete the training than students from urban and suburban communities. The mean post-test scores on relevant knowledge were significantly greater than the mean pre-test scores for all 12 online modules. Knowledge gain was positively associated with students who had a reliable Internet connection, students who were drawn to the training because it was free, and those with higher levels of motivation. Lower knowledge gains were significantly related to having more work/personal barriers and those who were drawn to SAFE practice because they or someone close to them had personal experience with sexual assault. Lower knowledge gain was also marginally linked to students who reported less comfort with computers. Students experienced a reduction in knowledge retention from 77.92 percent at post-test to 68.83 percent at the follow-up exam. Qualitative interviews with students suggested that the clinical training helped clarify, broaden, or solidify the content covered in the online modules. Most students reported using many approaches they learned in the training with their post-training patients. The details of the evaluation methodology are described. 4 figures, 18 tables, 188 references, training modules, and evaluation materials
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Investigative techniques; Sexual assault; Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE); Teaching/training techniques; Training evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.