Courts can increase the detection of conservator exploitation by facilitating communications from other stakeholders. These stakeholders include family members of potential victims, persons having care and custody of the individual, and existing surrogates such as agents under a power of attorney or advance directive. Under many state laws and court rules, these parties may receive or request the right to receive court documents in the case. In addition, public access to court conservatorship documents can improve accountability and counter a perception of secrecy under which exploitation might flourish. Reviewers external to the court can also have a role in monitoring conservator accountings and report any problems to the court. At least two state statutes designate attorneys to examine conservator accountings and report any problems to the court. Another means of monitoring conservator accountability is through professional certification, licensing, and disciplinary boards. Human service agencies can also monitor conservator practices to detect exploitation; for example, adult protective services agencies can investigate reports of suspected abuse, neglect, and exploitation. This Brief identifies other ways of monitoring whether a court is receptive and responsive to detecting exploitation; and it emphasizes the provision of judicial, legal, and professional training in detecting conservator exploitation. Each suggestion for improving a systemic approach to detecting conservator exploitation is accompanied by a discussion of related laws and regulations, as well as the general status of the implementation of the recommended practice across U.S. jurisdictions.