U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Deinstitutionalization of Corrections and Its Implications for the Residual Prisoner

NCJ Number
77041
Date Published
1980
Length
46 pages
Annotation
Prepared by the Secretariat for use at the Sixth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (1980), this paper focuses on deinstitutionalization and the treatment of prisoners.
Abstract
The United Nations has repeatedly affirmed the dignity and worth of the individual and faith in human rights. However, conditions of imprisonment in many parts of the world reveal a serious discrepancy between these universal ideals and the reality of penal practice. Justice should become a more universal basis of penal policy and correctional reform; justice requires restoring to prisoners a sense of dignity of which the physical reality of incarceration deprives them. In this perspective, the congress may wish to consider further action and followup in several priority areas. First, at the national level, increased efforts are required to reduce the number of prisoners by providing effective alternatives, more viable options, and more hopeful techniques for dealing with offenders who must remain in correctional institutions. Although some progress has been made to retain offenders for treatment in the community, newer modalities should be devised by drawing on local experience and customary practices and traditions. Moreover, practical guidelines for more effective application of the U.N. standard minimum rules are needed. Second, at the regional level, attention should be directed at developing an appropriate framework for the meaningful exchange of information, on a continuous basis, on the practices adopted and on their relative successes. Intensified activities of the regional United Nations institutes should be encouraged, and the role of the United Nations Social Defense Research Institute must be underscored. Third, at the international level, the exchange of experience and expertise among correctional administrators, system operators, and researchers is crucial. The paper provides 130 footnotes. (Author abstract modified).