skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 179975   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of the Lincoln, Nebraska Police Department's Quality Service Audit: The Impact of Citizen Feedback on Individual Officers
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Julie Horney ; William Wells ; Tom Casady ; Joy Citta ; Terrence Sherrill
Corporate Author: Lincoln Police Dept
United States of America

University of Nebraska - Omaha
Dept of Criminal Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 1999
Page Count: 94
  Annotation: The Lincoln Police Department (LPD) and the University of Nebraska at Omaha Criminal Justice Department established a working partnership that was successful in designing and implementing a randomized experiment to study the impact of the LPD's program of giving citizen feedback to individual police officers.
Abstract: Using a number of measures of officer attitudes and performance, this evaluation was unable to detect any differences between the experimental and control groups after 9 months of giving members of the experimental group monthly feedback from citizens with whom they had contact. There are a number of possible reasons for the lack of impact. First, a small group of officers participated in the experiment. Researchers were limited at the outset by the existence of only 103 officers who had not yet participated in the feedback program when the evaluation began. Further, only slightly over 50 percent agreed to participate in the experiment. A total of 57 officers were left between the experimental and control groups. In addition to working with a small number of officers, researchers were studying officers who may have been less likely to be positively influenced by receiving citizen feedback. Except for a small number of new recruits, officers in the evaluation study had all had earlier invitations to participate in the program and had declined. A group apparently less interested than others in receiving citizen feedback, they may also be a group less amenable to change based on such feedback. It is also possible that the group studied had been "contaminated" by earlier exposure to department-wide feedback from the program. It is possible, of course, that expectations from the program were overly optimistic. With no consequences attached to the citizens' evaluations, the information alone may not be powerful enough to effect behavioral or attitudinal change. 5 references
Main Term(s): Police performance evaluation
Index Term(s): Complaints against police ; Police-citizen interactions ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Nebraska
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0015; 95-IJ-CX-0117;
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.