skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 183461     Find in a Library
Title: Analysis of the United Nations Data Set on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems: Part I
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): R. W. Burnham
Date Published: 11/1998
Page Count: 32
  Annotation: This analysis of the data collected by the United Nations on crime and criminal justice since the mid-1970’s focuses on the nature and quality of the data set, issues related to analyzing data collected in different countries, interpretation issues, and the uses and limitations of the data.
Abstract: The data set includes a separate file for each year. Each file contains all the variables and cases for that year. The United Nations collected the data in five different sweeps, which covered 1970-74, 1975-80, 1980-86, 1986-90, and 1990-94. Issues related to reliability and underlying validity appear to vary from both case to case and variable to variable. Thus, the data are useful for suggesting and refining questions for further study, but not with any authority for activities hypothesis testing, which demand statistical rigor. Difficulties related to analyzing data across countries, cultures, or jurisdictions relate to definitions, recording practices, operating practices, factual inequalities, and crime recording. However, the use of ratios within countries is not vulnerable within countries. Data from different countries on attrition as a case progresses from recording through case processing through to imprisonment demonstrates the use of the data set. Using the data to analyze the precise amount of change in any variable from year to year is inappropriate. Appropriate uses include: (1) the development of descriptions of the dynamics of the main components in the criminal justice process; and (2) the generation of hypotheses. Organizations should use the data set for research and particularly to develop more precise questions. In addition, the National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics should urge the United Nations to improve data quality, even if the trade-off is less data quantity. Figures and appended technical details
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Data integrity ; United Nations ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Crime in foreign countries ; Criminal justice research ; Foreign criminal justice systems ; Foreign crime statistics ; Databases ; BJS final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 97-MU-CX-0002
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.