skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 184346     Find in a Library
Title: Coordinating Criminal and Juvenile Court Proceedings in Child Maltreatment Cases
  Document URL: Text PDF 
Author(s): Debra Whitcomb ; Mark Hardin
Date Published: 10/1996
Page Count: 3
  Series: NIJ Research Preview
  Annotation: Many cases of child maltreatment involve both criminal and juvenile court proceedings, each initiated by different government entities, and each pursuing different processes that may be incompatible, inefficient, and deleterious to the child and family; to learn how jurisdictions deal with these issues, researchers talked to a nationally representative sample of 103 criminal prosecutors and 59 attorneys who represent child protection agencies in the juvenile court.
Abstract: Responding prosecutors estimated that 60 percent of their child maltreatment cases were concurrently involved in juvenile court proceedings, often because a nonoffending parent was unable or unwilling to protect the child from repeated abuse by the alleged perpetrator. Conversely, child protection attorneys estimated that 13 percent of their caseloads were also involved in criminal courts. Findings show that little attention is paid to coordinating court proceedings in related cases. Following the phone survey, research visited four jurisdictions that had given special attention to the problem of coordination. All four jurisdictions had overcome potential problems with conflicting court orders in concurrent cases. Much of the credit for resolving inconsistencies went to defense attorneys, who often represented the alleged offender in both courts; probation officers, who incorporated juvenile court orders into their presentence investigation reports to the criminal court; and criminal court judges, who referenced juvenile court orders into their own orders governing pretrial release or probation. Policy implications are drawn from the findings.
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Child abuse ; Interagency cooperation ; Juvenile courts ; Child abuse and neglect hearings ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Parallel civil and criminal proceedings
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 92-IJ-CX-K034
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.