skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 184374     Find in a Library
Title: Researchers Evaluate Eight Shock Incarceration Programs
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Doris L. MacKenzie ; Claire Souryal
Date Published: 10/1994
Page Count: 2
  Series: NIJ Update
  Annotation: To determine how shock incarceration programs are operating and which objectives they are achieving, an evaluation was conducted for eight adult programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Abstract: In addition to studying effects on recidivism and prison crowding, the evaluation examined the development and implementation of the programs, the attitude changes of offenders during the in-prison phase of the programs, and the impact of the programs on the positive activities of graduates during community supervision. In all eight programs, offenders participated in a rigorous daily schedule of military drill and ceremony, physical training, and hard labor. Program length ranged from 90 to 180 days. Program participants were generally young males convicted of nonviolent offenses who did not have an extensive criminal history. Programs differed in the type of therapeutic programming adopted as well as the hours per day devoted to such programming. They also varied in size, location (within a larger prison or in a separate facility), intensity of release supervision, and type of aftercare during community supervision. Recidivism rates of graduates of shock incarceration programs were generally similar to those of comparable offenders who spent a longer time in prison. The major factor that influenced prison bed savings was whether the boot camp program targeted prison-bound offenders. Unlike inmates incarcerated in conventional prisons, boot camp participants believed that their experience had been positive and that they had changed for the better. The more intensely offenders were supervised in the community, the better they adjusted.
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Prison overcrowding ; Shock incarceration programs
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.