skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 193406   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Survey of Sentencing Practices: Truth-in-Sentencing Reform in Massachusetts
  Document URL: PDF 
  Corporate Author: Massachusetts Sentencing Cmssn
United States of America
  Date Published: 10/2000
  Page Count: 78
  Annotation: This study examined sentencing practices under Massachusetts' new truth-in-sentencing law, with attention to the incarceration sentences.
  Abstract: Chapter 432 of the Acts of 1993, "An Act to Promote the Effective Management of the Criminal Justice System Through Truth-in-Sentencing," established the Massachusetts Sentencing Commission and introduced the first phase of truth-in-sentencing reform in Massachusetts. The objective of the sentencing reform was to establish a more truthful relationship between the sentence imposed and time served by incarcerated offenders. Provisions involved the elimination of statutory good time, the elimination of parole eligibility at one-third or two-thirds of the minimum sentence for State prison sentences, and the reduction of the minimum allowable State prison sentences for certain felonies from 2 1/2 years to 1 year. The current research considered those defendants sentenced to imprisonment over the 6 years from fiscal year 1994 to fiscal year 1999. Estimates of the impact of the new law were not based on actual time served by offenders, but rather on expectations at the point of conviction. The study found that for offenders sentenced to incarceration, the expected time to serve was closer to the sentence imposed for those offenders sentenced under the new law; however, there was evidence of unintended consequences related to the implementation of Chapter 432. For those offenders sentenced to houses of correction, expected time to serve was longer for those sentenced under the new law. For those offenders with State prison sentences, expected time to parole eligibility increased, but there was no evidence that expected maximum time to serve increased. For those offenders sentenced to incarceration from the superior court, there was a shift in correctional jurisdiction from the Department of Corrections to houses of correction. 26 tables and 14 figures
  Main Term(s): Corrections policies
  Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; Incarceration and Imprisonment ; Sentencing disparity ; Sentencing commissions ; Sentencing guidelines ; Sentencing reform ; NIJ final report ; Massachusetts
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 96-CE-VX-0011
  Sale Source: Massachusetts Sentencing Cmssn
90 Devonshire Street, Room 1143
Boston, MA 02109
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.