skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 196815   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Offender Risk Assessment in Virginia: A Three-Stage Evaluation
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Brian J. Ostrom ; Matthew Kleiman ; Fred Chessman II ; Randall M. Hansen ; Neal B. Kauder
  Corporate Author: National Ctr for State Courts
United States of America

Virginia Criminal Sentencing Cmssn
United States of America
  Date Published: 2002
  Page Count: 139
  Annotation: This evaluation examined whether risk assessment at the sentencing stage has proven to be a viable strategy for diverting nonviolent offenders from incarceration in Virginia.
  Abstract: The evaluation team collected data to assess the risk assessment instrument during a 3-year pilot test that tracked the success (as measured by recidivism) of a group of diverted offenders in 6 of Virginia's 31 judicial circuits. The Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission (VCSC) designed the risk assessment instrument to identify -- from among eligible larceny, fraud, and drug offenders who would otherwise be recommended for incarceration by State sentencing guidelines -- offenders with the lowest probability of being reconvicted of a felony crime and divert them to some form of alternative punishment. The risk assessment instrument focused on offender characteristics and demographics, current offense information, prior adult criminal record, and prior juvenile contact with legal authorities. Information and data were developed on multiple case and offender characteristics for all offenders sentenced and diverted between 1997-1999; onsite observations and interviews with judges, probation officers, prosecutors, and defense counsel were conducted; and information was collected on the costs and benefits of diversion and recidivism. Based on its findings, the evaluation team concluded that the risk assessment instrument has been successful in identifying low-risk candidates for diversion. Risk assessment was well-received in the pilot courts by judges and probation officers. The instrument proved easy to administer, and the program led to cost savings without jeopardizing the safety of citizens. Further, the evaluation concluded that the theoretical framework and statistical analyses used to construct the risk assessment instrument were well-conceived and employed. This report recommends that following a revalidation of the factors included on the risk assessment instrument, the program should be implemented statewide. Extensive tables and figures, appended risk-assessment instrument and supplementary information, and an 80-item bibliography
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Risk management ; Diversionary devices ; Instrument validation ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Virginia
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 98-CE-VX-0009
  Publication Number: ISBN 0-89656-217-4
  Sale Source: National Ctr for State Courts
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.