skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 200331     Find in a Library
Title: Do Batterer Intervention Programs Work? Two Studies
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2003
Page Count: 14
Grant Number: 94-IJ-CX-0047; 96-WT-NX-0008
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: Text PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1  DATASET 2
Type: Case Study
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents findings from a study of the effectiveness of two batterer intervention programs.
Abstract: As an alternative to prison, batterers are often assigned to batterer intervention programs, which have proliferated in the United States during the past two decades. However, mounting evidence suggests they may be ineffective at changing batterer’s attitudes and deterring future violence against women. The effectiveness of the most common type of batterer intervention program, known as the Duluth model, was assessed by a study of one program in New York and one program in Florida. The findings indicated that the Florida batterer intervention program had little to no effect on batterers’ attitudes toward women and domestic violence and also demonstrated no effectiveness at deterring future violence against women. The New York study found that batterers assigned to a 26-week program, as opposed to an 8-week program, were less likely to reoffend, but neither group showed any change regarding their attitudes toward women or domestic violence. Limitations of the research are important to note as they present difficulties in drawing verifiable conclusions from the findings. Limitations include high rates of batterer drop out, victims who relocated and became unreachable, a lack of accurate measurement device to assess batterers’ attitudes, and the reluctance of judges to assign batterers to a no-treatment control group. Despite these limitations, the findings have important implications for policy concerning domestic violence, especially within the criminal justice system. 16 Notes
Main Term(s): Spouse abuse treatment programs ; Treatment effectiveness
Index Term(s): Battered wives ; Domestic assault ; Criminal justice program evaluation ; Domestic assault prevention ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200331

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.