skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 201303   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Validation of the Los Angeles County Probation Department's Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
Author(s): Susan Turner ; Terry Fain
Date Published: 01/2003
Page Count: 85
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 1999-IJ-CX-K008
Publication Number: DRU-2955-NIJ
Sale Source: Rand Corporation
2100 M Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Measurement/Evaluation Device
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study evaluated six different offender risk and needs assessment tools utilized by the Los Angeles Probation Department.
Abstract: As a result of the large influx of new offenders into Los Angeles county jails, many offenders, some of whom had previous been labeled “unfit for release,” have been released under supervision. However, the Probation Department has been unable to meet the supervision needs of the growing probation population. As a result of litigation and a county-wide assessment of needs, the Probation Department established a set of minimum standards. Three of the five minimum standards involved the creation of a series of risk/needs assessment instruments to be used with the probation population. The usefulness and validity of these six risk/needs instruments are evaluated in this report. The current evaluation examined the assessment instruments for instrument integrity, use of overrides, decisions, and relationship to long-term recidivism outcomes and served as a follow-up for the department’s own pilot study of their assessment instruments. Chapter 1 of the report provides background information concerning the development of the assessment instruments, and the two phases of the instrument evaluation. Chapter 2 describes the research methodology, including a description of the sample, how reliability was assessed, issues related to instrument validity and bias, and the relationship of the assessment instrument to recidivism. Chapter 3 specifically examines the assessment instruments used on Los Angeles’s juvenile population, while chapter 4 evaluates the assessment instruments for the adult population. Finally, chapter 5 offers the study conclusions, which indicate that the juvenile and adult investigation and supervision instruments adequately predict recidivism. However, some of Los Angeles’s other assessment instruments, such as the IDC instruments, lack adequate scale integrity and do not adequately predict recidivism. The conclusions contain discussions related to instrument bias for demographic factors such as race. Future research, due to be completed in 2004, specifically examines the validity of the assessment instruments used for juvenile intake and supervision. Tables, figures, references
Main Term(s): Instrument validation
Index Term(s): Probation ; Needs assessment ; Recidivism prediction ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. Page numbering of report is mixed between Roman numerals and numbers (pages 1-21 are labelled with Roman numerals).
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201303

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.