skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 201304   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Banking Low-Risk Offenders: Is It a Good Investment?
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
  Author(s): Kelly Dedel Johnson Ph.D. ; Jim Austin Ph.D. ; Garth Davies M.A.
  Corporate Author: Institute on Crime, Justice and Corrections
United States of America
  Date Published: 06/2002
  Page Count: 85
  Annotation: This study examined the effectiveness of the redesign of the Multnomah County‚Äôs adult community supervision program, which began using a system of graduated supervision based on risk assessment in 1997.
  Abstract: In an effort to increase public safety without increasing expenditures, Multnomah County (Oregon) redesigned their adult community supervision program, implementing differing levels of supervision based on offender risk level. The Oregon Case Management System includes an Initial Risk Assessment Instrument and a Risk Assessment Instrument that are used to classify those under community supervision as either a high-, medium-, or low-risk level. Corresponding levels of supervision are then employed, thus managing parolees more effectively by directing the bulk of resources toward the medium- and high-risk offenders. This study employed a quasi-experimental design using non-randomized comparison groups to determine the effectiveness of the redesign. The groups consisted of adult offenders admitted to community supervision during 1995, 1998, and 2000. The 1995 cohort experienced the traditional type of community supervision, while the 1998 and 2000 cohorts received the new version of graduated supervision levels based on risk level. Comparisons involving multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that overall the redesign accomplished its objective of assigning offenders to differing levels of supervision, thereby reallocating Department resources toward the medium- and high-risk offenders. However, the objective risk assessment system, described as the backbone of the redesign, was discovered to contain serious flaws. The override rates were found to be much higher than the acceptable standard, with most overrides serving to bump the offender into a lower risk category. As such, the supervision level and assessment of risk are based on subjective rather than objective measures. Recommendations include an evaluation of the risk assessment system to determine the reason for the high rate of overrides. Future research should focus on how the type and intensity of supervision impacts offender behavior. Appendix
  Main Term(s): Program evaluation ; Parole supervision
  Index Term(s): Corrections effectiveness ; Offender supervision ; Parole effectiveness
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2000-IJ-CX-0029
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Institute on Crime, Justice and Corrections
George Washington University
1819 H Street, N.W. Suite 700
Washington, DC 20006
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.