skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 203923   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Applying Problem Solving Approaches to Issues of Inmate Re-Entry: The Indianapolis Pilot Project, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Edmund F. McGarrell Ph.D. ; Natalie Hipple Ph.D. ; Duren Banks Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: Hudson Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 02/2003
  Page Count: 66
  Annotation: This report describes the implementation and evaluation of the Indianapolis Violence Reduction Partnership (IVRP), which used a problem-solving approach to reduce recidivism among former inmates.
  Abstract: The project began with an analysis of the re-entry population, which included a profile of prison releasees during 2000, a survival analysis of a sample of inmates, and interviews and focus groups with recently released inmates and service providers who work with former inmates. The problem analysis found that 40 percent of former inmates were arrested within 1 year of release. Younger inmates and those with more extensive criminal histories were at greatest risk for recidivism, as were African-American inmates. Barriers to successful re-entry identified by both former inmates and service providers were housing, substance abuse, negative peer influences, and anxiety regarding not "making it." Based on these findings, the IVRP implemented a pilot project that consisted of having recently released inmates attend a neighborhood-based group meeting convened by criminal justice officials and involving community representatives and service providers. The meetings were designed to combine deterrence and social support (linkage to services). In the evaluation, the treatment group consisted of 93 former inmates who attended 1 of 5 meetings. The comparison group was composed of 107 former inmates released at the same time as the treatment group but in a different neighborhood. The meetings were rotated geographically throughout the city, so both treatment and comparison groups were drawn from the three targeted areas of the city. Approximately 40 percent of both treatment and control groups were rearrested during the follow-up period (10-24 months). The treatment group survived longer (an average of 172 days) than did the comparison group (120 days) before being rearrested; however, this difference was not statistically significant in the survival analysis. Thus, there is a possibility that the difference was produced by chance. A program that begins in prison, attempts to build in family or other social supports, and that includes strategies for follow-up beyond the initial meeting with offenders may prove more successful than the Indianapolis pilot project. 23 tables and 17 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Post-release programs ; Aftercare decisionmaking ; Recidivism causes ; NIJ final report ; Indiana
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2000-CE-VX-0002
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Hudson Institute
5395 Emerson Way
Indianapolis, IN 46226
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Description
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: See NCJ-203922 for the Summary Report.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.