skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 209273     Find in a Library
Title: National Assessment of School Resource Officer Programs Final Project Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Peter Finn ; Jack McDevitt
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 02/2005
Page Count: 49
  Annotation: This National Assessment of School Resource Officer (SRO) programs identified the program models that have been used, how programs have been implemented, and what the programs' possible effects may be.
Abstract: There has been a growing interest in placing sworn police officers in schools as SRO's to improve school safety; however, when this national assessment of such programs began in May 2000, little was known about SRO programs. The national assessment of SRO programs involved a nationwide mail survey of established and relatively new SRO programs, which yielded 322 responses from law enforcement agencies with SRO programs and 108 responses from affiliated schools. Implementation data were collected by phone, and on-site visits were made to 19 SRO programs. The 19 programs were compared on 7 key dimensions: choosing a program model; defining specific SRO roles and responsibilities; recruiting SRO's; training and supervising SRO's; collaborating with school administrators and teachers; working with students and parents; and evaluating SRO programs. A survey of nearly 1,000 students in 3 large new SRO programs identified the link between perceptions of safety and the SRO program. Most of the 19 programs used a model under which SRO's enforced the law, taught classes, and mentored students; however, the level of emphasis for these roles varied considerably across and within programs. When SRO programs failed to define the SRO's roles and responsibilities in detail before the officers assumed their duties, then problems multiplied. Keys to an effective program are applicant screening, effective training, SRO supervision, and the school staff and parents' support for the programs. The student survey found that students' perception of safety was related to a feeling of comfort in reporting crimes, which was in turn related to having a positive opinion of the SRO and the frequency of conversations between a student and the SRO. 2 tables
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): School security ; School security officers ; School delinquency programs ; School security officer training ; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-IJ-CX-K002
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.