skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 209732     Find in a Library
Title: Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Validation Study: The RAVE Study -- Practitioner Summary and Recommendations: Validation of Tools for Assessing Risk From Violent Intimate Partners
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Janice Roehl Ph.D. ; Chris O'Sullivan Ph.D. ; Daniel Webster Sc.D. ; Jacquelyn Campbell Ph.D.
Corporate Author: Johns Hopkins University
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2005
Page Count: 15
  Annotation: This study assessed the accuracy of several approaches for predicting the risk of future harm or lethality in domestic violence cases.
Abstract: The methods tested were the Danger Assessment, DV-MOSAIC, Domestic Violence Screening Instrument (DVSI), and the Kingston Screening Instrument for Domestic Violence (K-SID). These instruments were selected because many service providers currently use them, even though little is known about whether and how well they assess the likelihood of future violence. Four New York City sites and two Los Angeles sites were selected for testing the instruments. A total of 1,307 domestic-violence victims were involved in baseline interviews. Follow-up interviews were begun in December 2002 and ended in early January 2004. Although follow-up phone contacts began 6 months after baseline interviews, the length of the follow-up periods varied among the sample for various reasons. Retention rates varied from site to site, ranging from a low of 33 percent to a high of 69 percent. Overall, of the 1,307 enrollees at baseline, follow-up interviews were completed with 782 (60 percent). At Time 1, 82 percent of the women had experienced severe abuse, with all but 6 percent having been physically assaulted by their partner or ex-partner. Approximately one-third had been re-assaulted by the end of the follow-up period (a maximum of 2 years). Repeat assaults continued to be severe, with 11 percent having experienced a potentially lethal attack. None of the instruments or method was impressive in predicting reassault. By most analytical strategies, the Danger Assessment had the strongest psychometric properties, including the predictive statistics. The DVSI and DV-MOSAIC also had significant associations with re-assaults. The K-SID was the weakest of the instruments; however, it did well in predicting re-arrests with the use of criminal justice data. Women's perception of risk did better than the other assessment methods. 11 tables and 13 references
Main Term(s): Victims of violence
Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Domestic assault ; Dangerousness ; Recidivism prediction ; Multiple victimization ; Instrument validation ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Violence prediction
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-WT-VX-0011
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.