skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 230795     Find in a Library
  Title: Much Ado About Sexting
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Miranda Jolicoeur ; Edwin Zedlewski
  Date Published: 06/2010
  Page Count: 15
  Annotation: After defining “sexting,” this paper examines its prevalence among youth, identifies its potential harms, considers whether it violates laws, reviews its prevalence in the United States and other countries, and suggests the appropriate societal response to “sexting.”
  Abstract: Wikipedia defines “sexting” as “the act of sending sexually explicit messages or photos electronically, primarily between cell phones.” Estimates of sexting prevalence from youth surveys vary considerably, suggesting that from 4 to 19 percent of youth have engaged in sexting. The most immediate harm that stems from texting is the humiliation of discovery by parents, authority figures, and unintended recipients. In extreme cases, suicides have occurred. Some cases of sexting have resulted in criminal prosecution, because the transmission of sexually explicit images of underage children constitutes child pornography in the United States. Conviction for a felony or a serious misdemeanor may create obstacles to college admissions and employment. There is no legal definition of sexting, making it a legal gray area. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to interpret child pornography laws in terms of teen sexting; however, holdings from other Supreme Court and State court cases on child pornography suggest that it is beyond the scope of the first amendment as a form of child abuse that occurs when the photograph of the child is taken. This paper reviews how various State courts have used child pornography laws to prosecute cases of sexting. Civil law remedies could also be used in egregious cases of disseminating provocative photographs through text messaging. This paper advises that law enforcement and prosecution should not be the first response. Parents and educators should be the first to respond to sexting. How parents and educators can best respond to sexting is a matter for further reflection. 65 notes
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Problem behavior ; Computer aided operations ; Pornography ; Sexual behavior ; Digital communications ; Juveniles ; Legislation ; Parental rights ; Child Pornography ; Child Sexual Abuse ; Informal social control ; Parental influence
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.