skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 231989   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policies for Reducing Sexual Violence Against Women, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
  Author(s): Elizabeth J. Letourneau, Ph.D. ; Jill S. Levenson, Ph.D. ; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D. ; Debajyoti Sinha, Ph.D. ; Kevin S. Armstrong
  Date Published: 09/2010
  Page Count: 77
  Annotation: This study determined whether comprehensive sex offender registration and community notification policies in South Carolina have reduced sexual reoffending or deterred sex offenses, and it examined whether unintended effects of such registration/notification policies have occurred.
  Abstract: The study found an 11-percent reduction in first-time sex-crime arrests after 1995, the year that South Carolina established sex offender registration and notification (SORN). This reduction occurred in the period 1995-2005 compared to the pre-SORN period (1990-1994); however, there was no significant decline in the 6 years after 1999, which was the year that South Carolina implemented its online sex offender registry, suggesting that online notification did not impact general deterrence for adult sex crimes. Across a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, 8 percent of registered sex offenders had new sex offense charges, and 4 percent had new sex-crime convictions. Registered sex offenders were not less likely to reoffend than nonregistered sex offenders. The study concludes that SORN, as implemented in South Carolina, apparently has had a positive impact on general deterrence in averting approximately three new first-time sex-crime cases per month; however, the State’s SORN policy has had no effect on deterring the risk of sexual recidivism. The SORN policy has had unintended effects on judicial decisionmaking regarding adult sex-crime cases. An increased number of defendants have been permitted to plead to nonsex charges following the onset of the State’s SORN policy and following its modification to require online notification. The net effect of this change could be to reduce community safety by increasing the likelihood that defendants who committed sex crimes will be allowed to plead to nonsex crimes or be acquitted. Also, it is not apparent that sex offenders who fail to register are more sexually dangerous than compliant registrants. 7 tables and 96 references
  Main Term(s): Effectiveness of crime prevention programs
  Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Judicial discretion ; Prosecutorial discretion ; State laws ; Sex offenders ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Sex Offender Registration/Registries ; South Carolina
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2006-WG-BX-0002
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Final Report Executive Summary located under NCJ 234598.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=254068

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.