skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 233986     Find in a Library
Title: State of the Science of Pretrial Risk Assessment
Author(s): Cynthia A. Mamalian, Ph.D.
Corporate Author: Pretrial Justice Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2011
Page Count: 42
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DB-BX-K021
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Pretrial Justice Institute
1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report summarizes the key points derived from a meeting of researchers and practitioners who met to discuss the current state of the science and practice of pretrial justice.
Abstract: The meeting addressed “significant next steps” in advancing the administration of pretrial justice, how to ensure efficient and effective release/detention decisions for pretrial defendants, the management of defendant risk through appropriate and specific conditions of release, and ways of balancing the rights of defendants with community safety. The report’s first section presents a brief review of the history and current state of pretrial justice. The second section identifies and discusses critical issues in pretrial release, detention, and risk assessment. The third section considers challenges in implementing evidence-based risk assessment and threats to reliable administration; the latter include time constraints, the practicality of using a risk-assessment instrument, money bail schedules, local capacity, subjective risk assessment, court culture, and judicial behavior. The report’s fourth section addresses methodological challenges related to the prediction of risk. The concluding section outlines the goals of the pretrial period and offers recommendations for research and practice. The goals of pretrial justice are to improve adherence to constitutional, statutory, and case law; increase the number of individuals objectively and thoroughly assessed; to reduce unnecessary pretrial detention while maintaining public safety and the integrity of the judicial process; and to save money through the more effective use of jail beds. Objective assessment should ensure that low-risk defendants are released on their own recognizance, that moderate-risk defendants are released with nonfinancial conditions and are appropriately managed in the community by trained and resourced supervision staff, and that defendants objectively assessed as being a danger to the community are detained after a due process hearing. Recommendations for research and practice suggest future directions. 3 notes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Pretrial procedures ; Pretrial release ; Pretrial hearings ; Criminality prediction ; Pretrial detention
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=255924

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.