skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 234789 Find in a Library
Title: Rising From the Ashes: What We Have Learned From the Cameron Todd Willingham Case - Plenary Panel From the 2010 NIJ Conference
Author(s): Mary Lou Leary; David Grann; John Lentini; Itiel Dror; Michael L. Ware
Date Published: June 2010
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|HTML (Transcript)|Video (10 segments, 01:21:55)
Agency Summary: 
Type: Case Study; Conference Material; Presentation (Multimedia)
Format: Video (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This video and transcript from the 2010 National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Conference cover the presentations of a panel that addressed how unscientific principles of arson investigation led to the wrongful conviction and execution of Cameron Todd Willingham in 1991.
Abstract: Based on the erroneous conclusions and testimony of the fire investigator in the case, Willingham was found guilty of the murders of his three children, who could not escape the fire. Only after his execution did an expert in the science of fire dynamics conclusively determine that the fire was not arson. One of the panelists - David Grann, a staff writer with “The New Yorker” - wrote an in-depth article that examined the questions surrounding the Willingham case, cataloging the case from initial investigation to trial and from the first appeal to the final plea. Another panelist - John Lentini, president and principal investigator with Scientific Arson Analysis - critiques the flawed principles of fire dynamics used in the Willingham case and argues for the grounding of fire analysis in scientific studies that examine fire patterns under a variety of conditions and causes. A third presenter - Dr. Itiel Dror, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University College of London - speaks about his NIJ-sponsored research that has investigated expert error and cognitive difficulty, as well as the impact of technological contextual information on cognitive processes of investigators. The fourth presenter - Michael Logan Ware, the Chief of the Special Fields Bureau in the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office - talks about his experience in case reviews that have identified evidence that points to new or additional perpetrators in cases of wrongful convictions.
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Arson investigation training; Arson investigations; Case studies; Evidence identification; Evidence-Based Practices; Investigative techniques; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Wrongful conviction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.