skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 236309     Find in a Library
Title: Commissioned Paper for National Institute of Justice Research Meeting on Longitudinal Data on Teen Dating Violence
Author(s): Dorothy L. Espelage, Ph.D.
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 40
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Literature Review
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper prepared for the U.S. Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice’s (NIJ‘s) research meeting on Longitudinal Data on Teen Dating Violence identifies relevant studies on longitudinal datasets that address specific types of issues related to teen dating violence.
Abstract: The literature review focused on longitudinal datasets in which teen dating violence (TDV) measures could potentially be added in subsequent data-collection waves, as well as those data sets where TDV outcomes have been collected but may not have been analyzed as the primary research questions. The literature review concludes that current understanding of the consequences of dating violence stems largely from cross-sectional studies or longitudinal studies that have major threats to internal validity, questionable sampling techniques, and assessment/questionnaires with weak psychometric properties. Many of the longitudinal studies are part of randomized clinical trials or effectiveness evaluations of dating-violence intervention. Students, schools, and communities that participate in an intervention study are inherently a biased sample; therefore, the data are compromised to some extent once an intervention is implemented. Ongoing surveillance studies often assess TDV perpetration and victimization with single-item indicators, which is understandable given the multitude of phenomena under investigation; however, these types of studies will never permit a complex understanding of TDV. Over-reliance on studies in which youth/adolescents self-report on their own individual attitudes and behaviors presents a limited picture of TDV risk and protective factors. Peer-level variables using ego-centered methods should be collected in order to determine how peers and friendship patterns buffer or exacerbate the risk for dating violence perpetration and victimization. TDV is a gendered interaction; however, very little longitudinal work has adopted a gendered framework. Despite a number of theoretical frameworks that have been proposed for TDV and intimate partner violence, many of these remain untested, given the dearth of longitudinal studies that focus on TDV. 31 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Research methods ; Research design ; Research uses in policymaking ; Acquaintance rape ; Dating Violence
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=258304

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.