skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 236959   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Crime Control Effects of Criminal Sanctions for Intimate Partner Violence
Author(s): Joel H. Garner ; Christopher D. Maxwell
Corporate Author: Joint Centers for Justice Studies, Inc.
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2010
Page Count: 161
Sponsoring Agency: Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation
United States of America

National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-WG-BX-0004
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study assessed the extent to which criminal sanctions (prosecution, conviction, and jail) are imposed for violence between intimate partners, as well as whether these sanctions are linked to repeat offending.
Abstract: A review of 135 English-language publications that reported on sanctions for violence between intimate partners determined that one-third of all reported offenses and approximately three-fifths of all arrests for intimate partner violence (IPV) result in a prosecution. The research also found that one in six reported offenses, one-third of all arrests, and over one-half of all prosecutions for intimate partner violence result in a conviction for intimate partner violence. A detailed review of 32 studies found that the predominant finding reported in this literature is that criminal sanctions have no effect on repeat offending. The literature review also found that methodological weaknesses (small sample sizes, diverse measurement of sanctions and of repeat offending, and the absence of statistical power analyses) limit the ability of these studies to provide a strong base of research that enables testing theory or evaluating public policy. Secondary analyses of the data available from these studies determined that the use of more consistent methods and measures across 12 sites generates the same general conclusion, i.e., that criminal sanctions are not significantly associated with less repeat offending. 7 tables, 3 figures, and extensive references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Sentencing/Sanctions ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Domestic assault ; Criminal justice system policy ; Criminal justice system effectiveness ; Domestic assault prevention ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=258979

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.