skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 238486     Find in a Library
Title: To Err is Human: Using Science to Reduce Mistaken Eyewitness Identifications Through Police Lineups
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
Author(s): Maureen McGough
  Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:270  Dated:June 2012  Pages:30 to 34
Date Published: 06/2012
Page Count: 5
  Series: NIJ Journal
  Annotation: This article reviews the findings of studies that have compared the reliability of eyewitness identifications of suspects in “sequential” and “simultaneous” lineups.
Abstract: In the “sequential” lineup, eyewitnesses view lineup members one at a time and make a decision on each individual in the lineup. In the “simultaneous” lineup, eyewitnesses view all members of the lineup together. The first set of studies reviewed consisted of laboratory experiments, which found that sequential lineups produce a better ratio of accurate to mistaken identifications compared to simultaneous lineups. Although laboratory results were promising, proposed changes in investigative practices needed to be field tested before widespread procedural changes are warranted. A 2006 study conducted with the Illinois State Police (the “Mecklenberg” report) found that in two of the three jurisdictions participating in the study, double-blind, sequential lineups produced a higher rate of identification of “fillers” (persons known to be innocent) and a lower rate of identification of suspects, thus contradicting the findings of laboratory experiments. In order to address criticisms of the study’s methodology, the American Judicature Society (AJS) convened scientists, lawyers, prosecutors, and police in Greensboro, NC, to develop a set of guidelines for conducting field experiments for testing the simultaneous/sequential variable. This resulted in the Greensboro Protocols, which emphasized the importance of true random assignment of lineups into the sequential or simultaneous groups. The consistent use of double-blind lineups in both groups is also deemed essential for conducting a scientifically sound field experiment. Relying on the Greensboro Protocols, the AJS developed a field experiment that compensated for the deficiencies of the 2006 Illinois study. This study found that sequential lineups reduced mistaken identifications without significantly reducing accurate identifications. Next steps in the research are outlined. 23 notes
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Evidence collection ; Suspect identification ; Line-up ; Police management ; Eyewitness testimony ; Eyewitness memory ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0046
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.