skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 240757   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Assessment of the Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative: Final Project Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Edmund F. McGarrell ; Nicholas Corsaro ; Chris Melde ; Natalie Hipple ; Jennifer Cobbina ; Timothy Bynum ; Heather Perez
  Date Published: 07/2012
  Page Count: 197
  Annotation: This report presents the methods and outcomes for the evaluation of the U.S. Justice Department’s Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI), whose goal is to support local communities in preventing and controlling gang crime.
  Abstract: The cities involved in the evaluation were Cleveland, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Tampa, Indianapolis, Oklahoma City, Rochester, Raleigh/Durham, Chicago, Detroit, and a seven-city region in eastern Pennsylvania. Regarding outcomes, CAGI cities had a larger decline in violent crime than the comparison cities that did not implement CAGI; however, the difference was not statistically significant. When level of implementation of enforcement was included, the high-enforcement CAGI cities experienced a 15-percent decline in violent crime, which was statistically significant. For the CAGI cities, higher levels of Federal prosecution for gun crime were negatively related to violent crime. Several key findings emerged from an analysis of CAGI implementation procedures. There was a consensus across the sties that CAGI had stimulated the development of a variety of new partnerships, mostly among criminal justice agencies. The most common enforcement strategies were increased Federal prosecution, increased State and local prosecution, joint case prosecution screening, and directed police patrols. The most common gang prevention strategies were education and outreach, school-based prevention, ex-offender outreach, and substance abuse treatment. The implementation of reentry interventions was the most challenging intervention, as most sites had difficulty in meeting target client numbers. At a minimum, greater attention must be given to effective implementation. Local CAGI officials recognized these challenges, and they recommended a planning period that would allow time for the establishment of effective partnerships before fully funding programs like CAGI. Also, greater attention should be given to developing reliable measures of gang crime at the local level. Federal funding agencies might make gang-crime data availability a prerequisite for receiving Federal funding for anti-gang programs. 28 tables, 14 figures 98 references, and appended evaluation instruments
  Main Term(s): Gangs
  Index Term(s): Police effectiveness ; Program implementation ; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs ; Violence prevention ; Gang Prevention ; Gang violence ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Florida ; Illinois ; Indiana ; Michigan ; New York ; North Carolina ; Ohio ; Oklahoma ; Pennsylvania ; Texas ; Wisconsin ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0035
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.