skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 241709     Find in a Library
Title: Promising Strategies for Violence Reduction: Lessons From Two Decades of Innovation (Project Safe Neighborhoods Case Study 13)
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Edmund F. McGarrell ; Natalie Kroovand Hipple ; Timothy S. Bynum ; Heather Perez ; Karie Gregory ; Candice M. Kane ; Charles Ransford
Date Published: 03/2013
Page Count: 23
  Annotation: This report summarizes key components and distinguishing characteristics of four programs designed to reduce and prevent violence, particularly gun violence.
Abstract: Since the mid-1990s, several promising interventions have had varying degrees of empirical support for their ability to prevent and reduce levels of crime and violence locally. Although there remains a need to develop additional evidence on the impact of these strategies and the identification of key components that are producing violence reduction, they suggest promising practices that local jurisdictions should consider in developing strategies for preventing and reducing violent crime. The four programs are Boston Ceasefire; Cure Violence (formerly CeaseFire Chicago); Project Safe Neighborhoods, a national program; and the Drug Market Intervention (DMI) in High Point, NC. All of these programs give priority to establishing new partnerships that focus on reducing violent crime, and all programs rely on research and analysis to support a data-driven approach to violence-prevention and control. All programs deliver a risk message to both the general public and those believed to be at greatest risk for being involved in violence, either as a perpetrator or victim. Three of the programs are driven by either local law enforcement or the U.S. Attorney’s Office, typically working together; the Cure Violence/CeaseFire Chicago program can be led by a mayor’s office, health department, university, or nongovernmental or community agency. The PSN and DMI programs borrow from the Boston Ceasefire program by using a focused deterrence approach. PSN emphasizes increasing levels of Federal prosecution for gun crimes, and three programs promote communicating a credible threat of increased prosecution at Federal and/or local levels. Cure Violence relies on the direct interruption of shootings or killings, behavioral change, and direct communication of credible messages to high-risk populations; and all the programs link at-risk individuals to legitimate services and social support. 3 figures and 67 references
Main Term(s): Community crime prevention programs
Index Term(s): Research uses in policymaking ; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs ; Violence prevention ; BJA grant-related documents ; Illinois ; Massachusetts ; North Carolina ; Gun Violence
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-GP-BX-K054
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program Description (Demonstrative) ; Case Study
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.