skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 242812   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Collecting DNA at Arrest: Policies, Practices, and Implications, Final Technical Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Julie E. Samuels ; Elizabeth H. Davies ; Dwight B. Pope
  Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 07/2013
  Page Count: 126
  Annotation: In order to assess the effects and implications of expanding DNA collection to include arrestees, this study examined the provisions of existing arrestee DNA laws, how the courts have interpreted these laws, and how they have been implemented by State laboratories and collecting agencies; it also addressed how this practice has affected the growth of DNA databases, the number of “hits” to forensic profiles, and the frequency with which DNA aids investigations.
  Abstract: The study’s analysis of State-provided data indicates that arrestee DNA law have contributed to additional DNA profiles in CODIS and additional hits; however, the study could not estimate the number of hits for which arrestee DNA laws were solely responsible. The study also determined that the implementation of arrestee laws has imposed significant administrative and analytical burdens on many State laboratories and collecting agencies. The ability to expunge arrestee data for arrestees acquitted or otherwise had their cases dismissed is cited as an important safeguard; however, expungements are rare when arrestees must initiate the process and are otherwise administratively problematic. The researchers advise that States that do not currently have arrestee DNA law may wish to consider the potential benefits of expanded collection in terms of a real but limited number of additional hits and subsequent cases resolved, given the administrative burdens and costs required in collecting from defendants before convictions, as well as the legal uncertainty surrounding the arrestee DNA laws themselves. Even if the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upholds such laws, questions will remain about their cost-effectiveness. The design of new laws should recognize the tradeoffs that may occur during implementation. Data sources and data collection are described. 23 figures, 9 tables, and appendixes with references, case summaries, legal matrix laboratory representative interview protocol, Interview coding scheme, sample data request, stakeholder interview protocols, and annual CODIS/NDIS data
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; State laws ; Arrest procedures ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ final report
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2009-DN-BX-0004
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: See NCJ-242813 for the Executive Summary
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=264887

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.