skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 243835     Find in a Library
  Title: Evaluability Assessments of the Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Model, Site Report: COSA Fresno
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Ian A. Elliott, Ph.D. ; Gary Zajac, Ph.D. ; Courtney A. Meyer, M.A.
  Date Published: 07/2013
  Page Count: 30
  Annotation: This study identified issues that should be considered in an evaluation design for Fresno’s (California) Circles of Support and Accountability, a restorative justice-based community reentry program for high-risk sex offenders with little or no pro-social community support.
  Abstract: The Fresno COSA (“COSA Fresno”) was part of a five-site assessment of COSA programs in the United States, in order to determine whether the programs had reached a stage of development and operation suitable for a rigorous evaluation. Overall, this assessment concluded that although operations at COSA Fresno are impressive given the limited resources available, significant investment in the site would be required in order to resolve evaluation methodology issues and obstacles that currently make COSA Fresno a poor candidate for rigorous evaluation. If such an investment were made, this assessment recommends that COSA Fresno be included in any evaluation of the effectiveness of COSA in the United States. At the time of this assessment, COSA Fresno had 25 Circles in operation. The program had deviated from the intended model in a number of ways. The intended model was derived from the COSA model developed in Ontario, Canada. First, some “core members” had not completed their full sentence, as they had been released into the community under a combination of COSA and formal parole supervision. Second, volunteer applicants for a staff position had not been subjected to an official criminal records check or a check of personal references. In addition, there were two key obstacles to an evaluation of COSA Fresno. There was concern for the financial viability of the site in the long term, and the limited number of COSA Fresno participants limited the potential for a sample size needed for a rigorous evaluation of the program’s impact. 2 figures and 18 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Social conditions ; Socially challenged ; Sex offenders ; Program implementation ; Socialization ; Post-release programs ; Social skills training ; Treatment techniques ; Sex offender treatment ; NIJ final report ; California ; Reentry ; Restorative Justice
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0008
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Grants and Funding
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: For the cross-site report, see NCJ-243832; for other site reports, see NCJ-243833-34 and NCJ-243836-37
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.