skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 243983     Find in a Library
  Title: FY 2011 Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects: Evaluability Assessment Overview of the Johnson County (KS) Reentry Project
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Janeen Buck Willison ; Lindsey Cramer ; Shelli B. Rossman ; Danielle Steffey
  Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America

RTI International
United States of America
  Date Published: 09/2013
  Page Count: 17
  Annotation: This study conducted an evaluability assessment (determination of whether a project is a candidate for meaningful evaluation) of the Johnson County (Kansas) Reentry Project (JCRP), a FY 2011 Second Chance Act (SCA) demonstration site, whose grant-mandated goals are to increase reentry programming for returning prisoners and their families; reduce recidivism of program participants by 50 percent over 5 years, reduce parole violations, and improve reintegration outcomes.
  Abstract: SCA year-two funding for the JCRP expired March 31, 2013. The JCRP reported the program did not receive SCA year-three funding. As a result, the program experienced almost immediate staff turnover and interruptions to operations; however, there is a strong commitment to the JCRP among many stakeholders, so the site has been involved in sustainability planning since October 2012. These efforts are described in this report. The difference in services being planned will be the level of case management, which will decrease due to the limited number of staff available to work intensively with program participants. These developments coupled with the uncertainty of future funding, precludes the development of meaningful recommendations for further evaluation. Although the EA site visit was ultimately canceled, Johnson County stakeholders engaged in EA site-visit planning and preparations; and they were enthusiastic about the possibility of additional evaluation. Stakeholders readily shared materials, including descriptions of services, aggregate numbers on program participants, etc. A history of the program was provided, including their experiences under SCA, lessons, learned, and challenges experienced. From these materials, the JCRP appears to have reflected the key elements of the SCA Reentry Initiative Logic Model, although staff noted several departures from the program’s original structure. Additional modifications were anticipated with the imminent transfer of program oversight from the Sheriff to the county’s Department of Corrections. JCRP activities at the time of these interactions of the EA team with Johnson County stakeholders are described. 3 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Prerelease programs ; Post-release programs ; NIJ final report ; Kansas ; Performance Measures ; Reentry
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-R2-CX-0032
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: For the executive summary of the full report, see NCJ-243978; and for the other individual site reports, see NCJ-243979-82 and NCJ-243984-88.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.