skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 243987     Find in a Library
  Title: FY 2011 Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects: Evaluability Assessment of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Healthy Environments, Loving Parents (HELP II) Program
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Jocelyn Fontaine ; Lindsey Cramer ; Monica Sheppard
  Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America

RTI International
United States of America
  Date Published: 09/2013
  Page Count: 31
  Annotation: This study conducted an evaluability assessment (determination of whether a project is a candidate for meaningful evaluation) of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) Healthy Environment, Loving Parents (HELP II) program, a FY 2011 Second Chance Act (SCA) demonstration site, whose grant-mandated goals are to increase reentry programming for returning prisoners and their families; reduce recidivism of program participants by 50 percent over 5 years, reduce parole violations, and improve reintegration outcomes.
  Abstract: The HELP II program uses a collaborative approach with several key community partners in implementing a model of case management and skills-building that assists mothers released from prison who are reentering a community in Franklin County. Based on its findings, the evaluability-assessment team recommends conducting a case study of the HELP II program in order to document program operations and the experiences of participants as a method of identifying critical lessons learned that may inform the broader field of practice and provide a foundation for future evaluation research. The HELP II site is not recommended for the impact evaluation because the target number for program participation is small (projected 30 participants); two of the critical enrollment criteria, having children under 10 years old and being released from incarceration in Franklin County, are not reliably captured in ODRC’s administrative data systems. In addition, there is considerable variation within the program that would be difficult to measure. Neither are there apparent plans to continue or sustain the program after September 2013 when the grant term ends; however, since the HELP II program is unique and relatively comprehensive, information about outcomes would benefit the field. Thus, an implementation/process evaluation or case study could be conducted. 3 exhibits, 3 references, and appended SCA logic models
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Prerelease programs ; Post-release programs ; NIJ final report ; Ohio ; Performance Measures ; Reentry
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-R2-CX-0032
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: For the executive summary of the full report, see NCJ-243978; and for the other individual site reports, see NCJ-243979-86 and NCJ-243988.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.