skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 244085   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Case Study of the Response of the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act Consent Decree
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Scott H. Decker, Ph.D. ; Melanie Taylor, Ph.D. ; Charles M. Katz, Ph.D.
Date Published: 11/2013
Page Count: 95
  Annotation: This study examined the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections’ (ADJC's) response over time after initial compliance with a Federal consent decree that mandated specific remedies for documented civil rights violations of juveniles in secure custody.
Abstract: The consent decree was instituted pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), which allows the U.S. Justice Department to investigate allegations of civil rights violations of institutionalized persons in State custodial facilities. The investigating agency may than enter into consent decrees or file motions of contempt in order to gain compliance by State agencies found to be in violation of the CRIPA standards. This study found that significant changes were made in each of the 16 areas of the consent decree. The efforts to prevent suicide were particularly notable. The remedies included both hardware and human responses, suggesting the importance of a broad and integrated approach to this issue. Given the focus of this study on long-term compliance with CRIPA, researchers were impressed that these changes have been sustained over time, even during budget cutbacks. The roles of both internal and external institutional pressures were significant factors in these changes, as well as the ability to sustain them over time. Holding the ADJC accountable by the commitment of external stakeholders (sovereigns) was a key to successful and sustained change. The study focused on the processes leading to Federal intervention; the resulting changes in the immediate months after the investigation; the status of services and quality of care after a reduction of funding for the agency; and how selected juvenile court jurisdictions perceive and respond to the changes. The study reviewed relevant documents and conducted interviews with key personnel (e.g., judges and administrators). 2 figures, 1 table, 90 references, and appended chronology of case events
Main Term(s): Juvenile inmates
Index Term(s): Civil Rights Laws ; Prisoners rights ; Human rights violations ; Juvenile suicide ; Inmate suicide ; Suicide causes ; Suicide prevention ; Juvenile justice policies ; Arizona
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2010-JB-FX-0014
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Case Study ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.