skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 244386   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Organizational Efficiency and Early Disposition Programs in Federal Courts, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): KiDeuk Kim
Date Published: 12/2013
Page Count: 103
  Annotation: In examining the impact of Federal courts’ “fast-track” programs on case processing time and sentence length, this study used Federal Justice Statistics Program data from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2009.
Abstract: “Fast-track” programs in Federal sentencing allow a prosecutor to offer a below-guidelines sentence in exchange for a defendant’s prompt guilty plea and waiver of certain pretrial and post-conviction rights. These programs have been authorized for use in some, but not all, Federal districts. They are used mostly for immigration offenses. The findings of the current study indicate that fast-track programs have reduced case processing time and increased sentencing disparity; however, the extent of the impact of fast-track programs on these outcomes has been modest. Fast-track participants who waived the due process right to appeal in exchange for a reduced sentence did not receive as much of a reduction in sentence length as anticipated. The estimated reduction in case- processing time was also moderate, producing modest savings in resources. This study advises that more attention should be given to how fast-track programs are implemented, since there is significant variation in the use of these programs across districts. Also, although immigration offenses have become the largest offense category in the Federal justice system, little is known about how immigration cases are processed. The report recommends that the Federal Government require higher standards of accountability, efficiency, and equity in the processing of immigration cases. In addition, research should be conducted on the process of prosecutorial and judicial decisionmaking in Federal courts, as well as the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of sentencing options in fast-track cases. 13 exhibits, 79 references, and appended approved fast-track programs involving immigration offenses, descriptive summary of analytic samples, and alternative modeling
Main Term(s): Court research
Index Term(s): Judicial discretion ; Immigration offenses ; Federal courts ; Prosecutorial discretion ; Sentencing disparity ; Case processing ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2010-IJ-CX-0013
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For the executive summary see NCJ-244387.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.