skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 244532   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Information Exposure, Presentation Modality, and Cognitive Mechanisms of Countermeasures in P300 Concealed Information Tests
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Michael Ross Winograd
Date Published: 01/2014
Page Count: 135
  Annotation: Three studies tested various aspects of the P300-CIT (Concealed Information Test), which is an event-related version of a credibility assessment tool that detects when a suspect in a criminal investigation recognizes crime-relevant information.
Abstract: The first study found that innocent individuals informed about the details of a mock trial responded to the P300 CIT similarly to guilty individuals. This demonstrates the importance of controlling the release of crime-relevant information in the field. If details of a crime are leaked to the general public, the accuracy of the test can be compromised, and false-positives are likely. The second study provided evidence that pictorial stimuli related to the crime may provide an advantage over verbal descriptions or stimuli related to the features of the crime. There was also evidence that focusing on central details of the crime as stimuli gain a stronger response than peripheral details. The third study examined the effect of countermeasures (CMs) used by a subject in attempting to defeat the P300-CIT. CMs are cognitive mechanisms used by a subject in an attempt to covertly block “guilty” responses that show familiarity with crime features. This study found that a subject needs to use only a single, simple, repeated CM in an attempt to defeat the test, rather than a more elaborate and complex strategy for each stimulus presented by the examiner. Thus, it is important that the examiner find ways to focus a participant’s or suspect’s attention on the probe stimulus in order to overcome the neutralizing effect of a CM. This report advises that given the amount of research being conducted on the P300-CIT and the number of researchers who currently support its use, the time is near for its first application in a criminal investigation in the United States. 12 tables, 15 figures, and 95 references
Main Term(s): Police equipment
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; Interview and interrogation ; Crime scene ; Criminal methods ; Investigative techniques ; Instrument validation ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0022
Type: Report (Technical) ; Test/Measurement
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.