skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244701     Find in a Library
  Title: Exploring Reasonable Efforts in Child Welfare Cases that Include Domestic Violence (Site A)
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Lorie Sicafuse ; Steve Wood M.S. ; Alicia Summers Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
United States of America
  Date Published: 11/2013
  Page Count: 20
  Annotation: This study examined how domestic violence (DV) cases are treated in juvenile dependency court in Reno, NV, and whether they are processed differently compared to cases without domestic violence.
  Abstract: The findings show that the court often recognized DV-related issues in dependency cases and attempted to address these issues in service orders. On the other hand, DV and non-DV cases were treated similarly in other respects. In just over one-third of the cases with co-occulting DV, DV was not identified as an allegation or problem on the petition; however, it was discovered in the course of case processing. Substance abuse was more prevalent among both mother and fathers in DV cases than among parents in non-DV dependency cases. Another finding was that service orders differed significantly for parents in DV and non-DV cases. Mothers in DV cases were more likely to receive orders for random drug screening, substance abuse assessment, and domestic violence counseling. Fathers in DV cases were more likely to receive orders for random drug screening, substance abuse assessment, and domestic violence counseling/batterer intervention programs. Court efforts to prevent removal of the juvenile from the home and to reunify the family were similar for DV and non-DV cases. In addition domestic-violence victim advocates were rarely involved in cases with co-occurring DV. Case time-lines, placements, and outcomes did not differ between DV and non-DV cases. Since these findings are based on a limited sample and not all initial study objectives could be achieved due to a lack of available case information, the authors recommend that future research examine more overarching themes in dependency cases that involved DV, such as whether perpetrators of DV are held accountable and whether efforts are made to keep victims and children safe and together. Using a structured case file review instrument, the study examined descriptive case information on 28 dependence cases with DV and 37 comparison cases with no indicate of DV. 7 figures and 3 tables
  Main Term(s): Family courts
  Index Term(s): Dispositions ; Comparative analysis ; Child abuse and neglect hearings ; Domestic assault ; OJJDP final report ; Nevada
  Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-MU-MU-K001
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.