skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 244702     Find in a Library
Title: Exploring Reasonable Efforts in Child Welfare Cases that Include Domestic Violence in Portland, Oregon
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Lorie Sicafuse ; Steve Wood M.S. ; Alicia Summers Ph.D.
Corporate Author: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2013
Page Count: 15
  Annotation: This study examined how domestic violence (DV) cases are treated in juvenile dependency court in Portland, OR, and whether their treatment of DV cases differs from cases without domestic violence (non-DV).
Abstract: The study shows that the court often recognized DV-related issues in dependency cases and sought to address these issues in service orders; however, DV and non-DV cases were treated similarly in other respects. One key finding was that substance abuse was more prevalent among fathers in DV cases than among fathers in non-DV cases. A second finding was that service orders significantly differed for parents in DV and non-DV cases. Mothers in DV cases were more likely to be ordered to attend domestic-violence counseling; and fathers in DV cases were more likely to receive orders to complete substance abuse assessment and treatment, as well as batterer intervention programs. Agency efforts to prevent removal of a child from the home and reunify families were similar for DV and non-DV cases. On the other hand, referrals to advocates for DV victims occurred in only a few cases, and there was no indication that such advocates were present at any of the hearings. Another key finding was that case timeliness, placements, and outcomes did not differ between DV and non-DV cases. The Portland Model Court, which was the site for this study, is developing action plans to further improve responses to dependency cases with co-occurring domestic violence. The current study reviews descriptive case information on 49 dependency cases with DV and 48 comparison cases with no indication of DV. Information collected included petition language regarding domestic violence, specific allegations, court orders, reasonable efforts, and services to all parties. 5 figures and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Court research
Index Term(s): Family courts ; Dispositions ; Comparative analysis ; Child abuse and neglect hearings ; OJJDP final report ; Oregon ; Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-MU-MU-K001
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=266783

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.